| Show i ur H COUNT i il y l PEOPLE EOPlE PROTEST i Y B t s l lons Adopted Anent Water 1 l Raising Enterprise V f Hf tH f IX HELD i George l I Cannon amid 1 1 1 l ruel frol hi aI L COUl I 1 1 d ds s r rr 1 Ib f 01 Pro Provo i inn nn and were out In today I 1 till the meeting olec called to take JIP In regard to the tho proposed Plan t rising alIng the tho waters of Utah ial lle i Point b bS by S Ii ely Ity and the Jordan l I rc Co The large court is Ind and much fl I It wn decided by the thet t tI that the farmers CarmeN would co u with Utah county and the cities cli tee of tim li i In action to top p ir y out raising of the he Lake n oo C Point A gam many of those present spoke at I l against the proposition ig It would lie bl tho ho mean of rUinIng t iii of acres of Good Il disease there l sr r who tho favored the tho Pian pf of r against the tho raising Of th lake In ucla sOda a 1 liS as to submerge the on OI the or of the tho lake but thought though by a 1 system of the came rj c uld he obtained without Injury to t the tho land landa but In fact would many tunny thousands of oC acres of good coM l land nd Tl The o in however were ore ot of the tho oJ opinion huLl It If the lake vas Willi It t L impossible to take care of awl e wat waters nt George e Q C Cannon and Smith were vere present and took Interest in III nil alt the proceeding The they stated ns as and anil to state to tile the meet hit th the of Sail Bait Lake City In Ini inthe th the matter annon stated that Salt Lale CIty In doing what It II had done doneas as only protecting Its own rights lie He thOught till PeoPle VOtO right In their to protect their rights all It was to guard shat Snit Sail Lake believed to 10 be lice her rights that the city Md led filed notice of tb surplus waters ot of Utah lake ani time the Intention to raise ralso the tho same I Lake City has no mIen Inton lions or of i upon the tho rights of lI thU lit utah county A few days nio n Mr loIr linnon stated lint ho he halt had had o a with Mayor Thompson 11 i to lo this manlIer and was reo re to ii this meeting and asure the pie of oC this county that Halt Lake Ity will not or 0 duos doe not lii to 10 rdse r lao tim the Waters of lake above What Is known ns as to 0 the tho of time tho but is s DOW bIng done is to t Jt Iak t ii l true trU position Is If er st d Yr the fight fo i If mi much aSIt aSh ir dl II 1 p II of thu work ork being done I City l W aLe H a 0 motion JI protect Salt JI or or iler s ll the thc etc which was I t r City Cit orthe or thy I l Power Corn m r other hr There were a Ir great tt ninny motions motiOns mOUriM etc de depre pre Je ti d out of hili h the following s SwIre ro n I I pi ed Wl lh The Th far n rs and nud residents or toun county ty are opposed to the ther r of th the of at Utah lAke wn way above Ie PoInt leri J 1 S Inches above i Salt City ansi the tho ElectrIc com comp p a 1 and others are 10 waters Q tera of Utah tO A above said Compromise p Points l ui be It n MHd That ThaI w we pledge e our to the bortl of county at af county and to tJi corporatIons of saW MId j county ty therein to assist U r i bynn by nfl legal lelal or to Prevent II said fd Salt Bait Ci y ar 1 the said Jordan Narrows 1 r romp company ny and all oth otho o ni i r individuals from In any r with or at t Li rale rai the ot of said lake InK ib v iII ilM Compromise Point to 11 If f the tho residents of Utah t cOunti A tI r of Walter r Scott I of Provo and D I Jl Th rot nt Lehi was appoInted to toI I h u the previsions of the l lion ri out The committee was itU to call I a meeting I t at nn any time It Vias Int d ii |
