Show NOW ON 01 TRIAL fOR HIS LIFE MI of the Day Sp lit in Prel Powers Challenges the Entire Panel of Jurors Io Objects to 10 n of the Court CourtIs Is Overruled Judge Struggle for a Jury Well Under Way by y The Defendant is Accompanied in Court by his Wire Wife an and d ig Big Crowd of Spectators tors in Attendance Throughout the Day Stromberg Remains iii Cun County Attorneys Plays Plas Wih With ts His Bab y bile te Jurors arc Being eing Progress jl lade de Thus Far r n crowded l S a put I L the m r John U II Dm j nl s Jk k n up U In tho district I t 51 r e ery eat In the big lobby when wien the eslon com 1 II I being beni noticed H bar te were re a fp ri c 4 I n n cither side entered I i t S t r senator Arthur Arthurf r f Y Ut ItI and andI zt I AI A torney Van nn Cot CoLt I a close to the thet JoS II lne cose brother or of orr t Victor a j r or and ani S 1 L Clawson Ft distance and were e d m the t pr rJ ot of the MorrIs Q r 0 at the tho opening d i tI Ju Zane and L R It itt 11 r the rhe defense were P 1 Ir f the table close II L I P tr f 1 b ty Denbrook Benbrook hIs hIst li j t eis sr r II K nuIte I U 1 rr r 10 when whon i tho ih court rom room Benbro k tl ii hewed l I rh no doubt ot of his hll Is C I t r 1 Ih f nt He Wil was ad louk i U I as though just c th barK ba S F vis 11 lie was I c I dark dUk suit ul nd II a I tl t k chair k like a sue suc 11 or p tt man mank k kIge ladre In Ife a ey bir hr td l tn and nd with 1 fo 13 ThE The W 11 bl and the sher sherI I 0 a gr p which WI was at atm m at d it j I by the a I or of bB rk An arI hr babY and the nii g aw They too tooK a i U lcd by Mis a r st al the reent recent trial nearly L I JUr b x 1 ant ok his child upon hs his t 1 1 the little telo fellow te the dl day watched proceedings r fb fare of oC each juror I rt Ind strict attention to toC C Wn madl g E MADE ADE t ti I I ty lu i 0 dork TrI k when JUdge Judger r i p to open court 11 1 at Jar thi lb trial was be bet t I f C moring morning 1 b Z r hi or of Utah 1 h L n Are you OU I IP U tJ replied Judge 1 j nt seem to be s so t II rg I think so your our oura a g at the crowd of 7 H I Ii p him Ird and he I 5 at ar tI fn r 11 y ot of II T then a WIth three lh thre 14 tho lly I I t went vent through ilI Ihm Ih m simply a as to I ato p the test teat h tie D d A H Nash ti l r J 1 J amusIng 4 Jal J th ho 1 11 clerk In the in Wi evidently I IH gt fy t and lot no time g t tt that his la Sal dee t Prosecutor L tUt m h Van ha asked questions Ur Iv l W t t jd ot f but Mr 1 t ar him hm ane and waz 1 k B Gran Gra l ot of the tho nIng liIng 5 lt I r i j to t the fortunate rr r t t 1 JUI Jury service by I J F Ef E i x i d I hl his pro proy I m y areep and 4 I l i lr f li for tor pI ph In s A to L 11 t y t t ut a jurors III ei JUdge a I is which Iad had t It Tree r the trial It al 1 In another ti I ItI i i f It taa ot of It I U C r hat th the de 13 er Ij I nl h t Indicted b by n a s t wa In o j tb dati I f CI tt JitT riM clon tIon I ip over oer C ta I hWe you rou the tho 1 l i r t 11 I b h l ed n a chat chal hj b i oC r juror juro In I I 4 cf d thau T th r to 10 tt tran serve ere for I rh 01 Ud In a ease case 1 It I Jury box for tor I lt s f J p bat Patent that r r t the ID existence v t tt l Id u L b by R ry to i were ere drawn 4 b I D la JUd t Powers J L tle t lit sworn Born and ot II n pin In L b n ot of I I I 4 L 4 I r n tide lide tar re I I 1 p lr r 0 th facts t tL I ta II nt by Ihl Jq ow f t D o lT b th t el tn In t the chiI chat d fart that the hp IS claimed could f N e lt fn I the least If Il least J I s ol r ra t t the Objection I t Itlay it t Lay U and the Ir id I t qt qa be made I w n trial a t ta vLa I tn d the challenge ltd flotd the ex of jurors wal was taken up by Judg WL n It young tanner farmer ot of wa war Hl He had Td red the reports H f the shooting ot of C Morris tt I on the tho oven even lug Ing of Jul July lh In the News and ond other papers had tol followed owe t the he tel tea glen at the pr hear hearing ing and had hod formed nn an opinIon opinion Ion as to the guilt or innocence of the Iho defendant Te The challenge to 10 this juror ivas W T p had hod Coned farmed an opInion ot of the cast case that would strong testimony to remove le He WIS was excused Judge Power Powers examination or Of K B N or of Murray Murra wa most live ns as the tho juror to fl Itil the ro re Mr Ir Jacklin who Is a faner fanatic married and 3 yeas ot of age had heard of oC the e cue and rend ot of tt it but hall had no He woUld able the defendant doubts doubt the benefi benefit ot of al all relon reason reasonable the tort fact that the Is IsI Isa I a gambler affect your our judgment asked Jud Judge e Power No I would d I ie e It upon the law lav lavand antI and th evidence W Would the fact that the defendant Is not a a member ot of sa have hae any with lh your 0 Nole one Ar Are you OU acquainted l with Senator Arthur kio wo WIO he Is Would the fact that a Ver very powerful ron desires the of this man have any erect effect on your our ver diet None whatever 1 I lar ar cI m 1 for r th the l defendants acquittal or conviction I riot not Charles M had heard ot of the case rend read of It 1 and talked abut about It but the hI he ha had heard were ere so 80 conflicting that ho had not up his mind lS its to the guilt or limo Inno Innocence canes cence ot of the accused The tact foot that the defendant was A gambler would not ot of alet the jurors judgment In Inthe the case nor would he e be wand swayed by clamor C D 13 Durt Durat the ruining man WIS was In about the tho saro same frame ot of mind n as Mr and both were passed for forthe I the time LEDA PRESENT Leila Stromberg the woman In the tho case was waR ent at the afternoon but not come Into curt court she sat In Attorney room I adjoining and th the time reading n a book Steve Slee Keen also came In during durin the afternoon ant and occupied 1 a seat Beat In the tho lobby hil his examinatIon of Jurors Judge Powers questioned Thomas nc Me Evoy Eoy manager ot of McCoys Ihor livery eta ta table We ble who answered that ho he had hac heard and rad read of oC the case but had not formed an any fixed opinion al as to the tho case J C Lambert had read about the case generally bil but believed that ho he coul enter Upon the trIal impartially and give he 1 a erdl t In accordance with the tho law and the tho evidence In the case 1 be In Iny any way prejudiced In the should I It apper that the th deceased Was waB n a prominent young burl buel nell ness man belonging to a moat excellent family while hlo the tho defendant at the time or of the shooting was a professional No sl ath p The Juror had an which amounted to nn ap opinion however and andI I it would require lre evidence t to remove the same Bame Judge Powers challenged Mr ir Lam Im Lambert bert berl fo for actual blaB bias and also lor er Im pled piled blaB bias The he prosecution this and Mr Putnam took I a hand In the ox to show that there vets n no bins bias biasIn II In parsing upon the tho mater matter i ill said ll there was no bias blag manifest nM aid I ho challenge was a overruled I |