Show ADVERSE AUVERSE TO THE ASSOCIATED TED PRESS Springfield Is Ills Feb the lp ap appeal peal of the corn com pan parry against the e Ij C the supreme court today ren tred un opinIon Ion reversing the i ret by the tho Cook county circuit cO and the ap court for the frt first sad and remanded the ce case to thC circuit court with directions to enter I ieh e I as prayed for In tl the origInal lil tle tiled by bythe bythe the PublishIng c compiler to tor r restrain the Associated sue IUS pendinG pending or expelling t the o from 18 its membership and from refusing to furnish It news according tolU Its cn con contract tract I This 11 bill set sets up the fact A As Associated has hal been beon ablo to control the business ot of bu and Se Al cumulating news in Chicago and ar I seln selling the tho caine and hn la lag Ing thus lImos Cor I Itself an eX monopoly and to lo such h mUM na poly bad declared the tho un and PublishIng association or r rc c In to itt n and h to mItI h tt of t or I It was 19 also alleged that the t I thad had compelled some ome ot of Is its m mbel ly by threats to cease buying te the special J nwe ot of the Sun Printing and I association under Is Its contract with lh I its members Including the appellant The ap elee fled filed an Inow answer r to 10 the bi bill and n a hearing wa was had the circuit court dismissed the 11 bill for want ot of equity and 01 oil appeal to the I court this dere decree wal was affirmed The supreme curt court now reverses this decree and remands the cas case The opinion written by Phi Phil Phillips lips holds that the the corporation ha has use Ii its ha has charged Its business with In Int Interest t terest rest restI I it hal has r devoted Is its to a pub puh le lie ule use and has In efel effect t to Ih the such uch In an interest In Iti Ul use that I it submit to by the public for tor Ihl the common gOld good to the e cx tent of t the Interest I It has thus cr created In the public In ls its The sole ole purposes for Cor whIch u hews r Wk was gather gathered was that the same huId b be besold Ild sold and ni nil newspaper PubliShers de desiring t siring to purchase luch news tr pub ar are to Purchase tb Ih route without discrimination I them W I i The Tho clause or of the tho contract sought to restrict the appellant fr I I obtainIng neWs from other sourCes than from appellee Is In an attempt lt itt ton tion upon the trade and business the citizens of a common t n Cili caim never ncr be held t I pUblic Inlo interests and by contract dr r can never neer be looked Upon with faor b by the courts The court linda that the blaw f C the appellee corporation tk to pr prent I ent It its I members from its ils special or other news newa or reel ln curb news train nn any person dt dedi l u b I it hoste hostile is II not required for rd o nor the pur purposes ur ursel poses sel or of the creation ot of ta To Co enforce thIs bylaw nn and ta made under It would enable tt al a to designate to the character t news to he h published and heth tnt Irn or tab falte ther there could be no check tm n it I b by publIshing news newl from other sources source e would be In the he I ton tion of a In II its favor an 1 could designate the character t f neWS nwe it would furnish and nud could dk th Ir l interests of time tho public Such Suh 1 u Wil as never ner contemplated ln ted in its I n nand and h is hoste hostile to Int r lb cr The clear effect ot of this tp 1 U monopoly which render I 11 |