| Show CLAIMS HE WAS Nel Nell Wants 1266 Damages from W H 11 Cromar el ci at ai Plaintiff Alleges that le die as Dc in a Real Ux Ex Exchange change Del Deal Nel Nell fe filed n an acton action against William II H Cromar and One Onesime sime elme Douron tn In the tho Third district court tOn today to ns as dates damages sue sus tamed on account of the perpetration of fraud and deceit decell In a certain real estate transaction Plaintiff alleges that In December Issa 1895 he owned a piece of oC property rols rods square In thIs timis city which to together together gether wih with the Improvements won reasonably worth 2400 subject Mw hOw hOwever ever eer to an encumbrance of oC 10 1000 Atthe At Atthe the solicitation or of defendants It ItIs itin Is in alleged plaintiff entered in into to an agreement with them whereby he and his wife conveyed a party by the nale name ot of Budget for the defendants his house and lot lottor for tor 7 74 In mone money an t equIty uly In n a lot lotIn lotin In Golden Park valued nt at 0 and the fee Cee title to a quarter of oC land In Kanosh Vale Valley Millard coun count county t ty says sas the land In Millard was represented to hIm lS as being ble bie for or farming purposes fenced In wel veli supplied wih with water etc ete log hOle barn ten aces acres ot of growing lucern JU gar dun truck and the like and that an all WAi worth Plaintiff further las says he be did not go to see seo the property and made no investigations con concerning the saie same le lie says sas Ito he relied absolutely up upon upon on the statements nl and ot of defendants but now nois that the land landIs I Is and was ns at the Um time ot of the ex cx change e absolutely valueless that I it I Ionn is ison onn on a mountain ridge accessible only b by that not one acre ot of I it II is isor or ever was broken or planted to lu lucern cern or garden track that there Is no fence around the land no log 01 hous house or barn upon I it and more Is not In Kanosh but fifteen miles away and never Wan worth n a cent ny By reason of the alleged fraud anti and deC deceit of DC de defendants practiced upon him plaintiff says ho hues has ben been damaged In the of to fey whIch amount he noU now demands Judgment Pierce at aie Ras attorneys |
