OCR Text |
Show i and John A. Egbert were then called. The first were examined, challenged for cause and excused, and the second waa being examined when the noon adjournment adjourn-ment was taken. This leaves forty-seven Jurors in th!a panel. The State has ten peremptory challenges left and the defense seven. It la not Improbable that another venire . win have to be Issued before the Jury1 can be completed. . Ko' additional Jurors were secured this morning' to try the murder case of the State vs. Frank P. Rose, though about a dozen talesmen, were examined as to their Jury qualifications. Only nine have been secured after five and a half days' work. - When court opened this morning, seventy-five prospective Jurors were examined on their voir dire by District Attorney Elchnor and seventeen were excused on several different causes. Clerk Buckwalter then began drawing names from the Jury box. The following follow-ing were called and examined as to their feelings In the case. . William H. ' Gulver. J.- H. Mldgley. George E. Wallace, (leOrge M. Cajinon, Beth T. Rigby. Henry W, Spencer. O. P. Arnold, Harry S. 'Lyon, Louis W. Critohlow, Joseph E. Sanger, John .L.Walker .L.-Walker and Joseph Goff. . All were challenged for cause by the defendant and excused -except Joseph E. Sanger. . He was passed for cause by both sides, but excused by the defense On the eighth peremptory challenge. Neals A. Randehoff. B. A. M. Frolseth |