Show COURT UPHOLDS HOLDS ARMS EMBARGO LAW LAVI Neutrality Program 1 Furthered by Decision V WASHINGTON Dec 21 21 W Iii n a ruling generally intI irias in iri- tI as having an important im fm m bearing on f ng tg congressional consideration tion Ii of t neutrality legislation iSe supreme court held today the president of the United ted States must be given rg ge degree degre e of latitude in foreign relations F F's s 1 a 7 1 t to 1 vote ote it upheld the of the 1931 1934 arms embargo act which authorized President Roosevelt R ose elt to forbid the theasle ule ile of f munitions s in this country for US DM use in iii the recent Chaco war between Bolivia and nad Paraguay I The decision administration officials oW- oW ah believed cleared j ray ny for general neutrality legisla- legisla ti Lan vesting bro broad d discretionary authority authority au au- au- au In the president government lawyers said the theon theorn orn on not only removed any doubt of i the Ji constitutionality of the prest pres- pres t i law but opened the o extension o of that act if it the Dext itco congress gress so desires It 1 4 Had Inside Data Data While hIle the courts court's opinion was con- con fired kd fu d to President Roosevelt's auth au authority au an- th to forbid Jh h sal I of mu mu- n. n in this country for use in th war between Par and and Par Par- W it noted that the chief executive ex ex- oft often had haa confidential in information information in- in formation on n foreign relations which was not available to con- con ires pea This consider consideration Uon it said sald discloses the o of J congress in this field of gov- gov mental power to tolay lay down nar- nar standards by which t is to be governed adjourning for two weeks w tr the holidays the court agreed J 0 review a controversy Involving ie he constitutionality of the Frazier Frazier- mke ke act granting a year three-year moratorium on farm mortgage closures Arguments probably 11 iU be held in March followed I y 1 ft a decision a few weeks l later ter Jt ft t refused to review a case chal- chal g ng constitutionality of the 1936 ct ci Broadening federal regulation I. I commodity exchanges The ap ap- tal J was brought here in advance f I the e customarily required ruling T 7 a circuit court of app appeals pp als ls k I. Review Plea Shelved Toe rhe court cout did not act today on on a for reconsideration of its 4 f to 4 division upholding of the New ew York eb insurance law implements the federal so- so ai security act fliers was wa Immediate speculation fec er whether a Decision on rehear- rehear g t ik th controversy versy might not be until Justice Stone ill Ut dysentery is ls able to return M. M 1 Is court duties |