Show f ARM f UTAH 2 MARK MARK la farm production was greater this year ear than tha In 1929 andin and andin in in- in in many Instances showed d an nn C crease th average e production t fot f. 1 the pOst past ten years cars Frank Prank Andrews Androws An An- An- An drew drews federal agriculture livestock statistician announced in his annual annual annual an an- nual crop cr p report issued Saturday The total value o of the farm farn crops in ht 1930 at nt the prices which prevailed on December 1 I 1 Is estimated estimated estimated esti esti- mated at as compared red with in 1929 and 40 10 for the tho a average ralo of ot th the pas past five ho years Mr Andrews stated The present low lo v value lu this y year ar Is 19 duo to tho the general genera decline In prices throughout the country Utah fared better than the United States as whole a-whole the value of ot the crops of ot Utah this year is down about 38 per cent while hll the time United united Unit unit- ed States has a a. total l value aluc this year which h is about bout per per percent cent ent under tinder that of ot 1929 Crop conditions ns In Utah this year ear were generally en rally above average a arid and d the average yield of all field fJeld cr crops ps was was' 37 per cent above the average average average- for the tho past ten ye years l There herc was tas an ah increase ot of acres m more re land harvested in 1930 as compared com corn pared with 1929 Th The various leading crops were valued as follows Ha Hay wheat other grain groin 2 sugar betts belts po potatoes po- po and the three main CS s including snap beans bean peas pens and tomatoes The four chief orchard fruits In Including In eluding apples peaches pears pears and ch cherries are are valued at I while the p principal truck crops grown for market and not for canning canning can can- ning amounted to can I |