| Show ES NO J Patterson Says NOr No Tax Revision r i On 01 Spenders ers Back PI Plan f J Wale Wage Earners Hit L' L I J Cartoons False k 0 B y SENATOR KNOX PATTERSON of Moab b ber b er of f the Legislative Tax Ad Advisory Committee re can be but ono one legitimate J lor for the tho proposed tax amend amend amend- and that Js is to reach In- In bIB bla properly n woi S state tato to oZ r Yf f r. r 1 c i has as w t b rc es- es f.- f. 1 taxation i 4 w h the x fM x ac- ac act t ti titi eh ti Ii Just t tills this h 1 s w. w t w wIt It ft Irr ft highly W d dt t J 0 n. n b I e 0 t Ji fe c r that dJ t r rt t bo to to tho of oC tat tt bc because r rho i Ilia h ho fact fad that j I li should be n dU 6 t r. r 1 a l' l Mi S 1 rh ii at t we ce we must ut I Tp T- T t p is capital to Sen Patterson top lop op her resources and a Do tax taxI money a brought into the state I Mol Id d. d of industry will bo one more er tr against that money coming cominS That hat bat seems elementary t to tome methe me me Ithe the people of ot the state stat will vIII be beu u tally benefited by Indu industrial the the armors s. s the the- thela lat lath lathe la- la t th the merchants and all an forms illness and arid any innovation Inon Inri in ilon on ri which will have the effect development should be led eJ if It p possible I e enl admit h however wever that there ia 8 PD possible necessity for a tax ta tax Intangible property I mean in- in pr pr property perty as as' such and not 1 wIses wages I hope hOfle tho day daj never mever come when the wage a- a ars rs will m bo be required to to bear any Lif share ha c of ot ti Uie burden of go goy gOv- int IlL nt this his hedge hodge podge of f confusion n Itten into our constitution and we e ve will be tax legislating and courting for the next twenty To a any i r Impartial I mind i it ibo bo clear that the whole hole scheme schema get more money foney Who is IS be- be beit it 7 The Th Th spenders penders chiefly schools organized to a man men mant ment t the thing over co ce when did the schools schoola take the economic life of the state tate they thay interested in i u t taxes are re ret t interested in leR ity a of tax Jax- 1 or more money Does any- any iver Yer vcr know know of their advocating my in public aff affairs irs Let u une us s Emy KJ ne ne' ne e into the qu question a ion pf pf- the of tK propaganda da that f is i. IU tho Tax Revision f Ct which Is il is jp-by jp p by the 11 ir Fr io ct l m mc i crit cartoon n c rth li h hand ll i T Tax X colleague n reaching for tor a. a man pp fco bo running for tor de dear r o of dollars stocks and andi i f falling 1 from rom his hands If Y b t this this this' catt oat toon on tin em- II facto fact and that thit is lis that league is after tho the 1 icy r. r r ro o we ven It iff- iff intended to convey convoy i Wea ba tho Tax I nio Is Ia after th bloated bonder bond bond- bond I ler er has zo Ea o. o many dol dollars rs t cant can't carry I Eu u alL aIL r t L i fV ou lm get tb the thC Ii L t of ot dol del I lof of Jn intangible wealth In Sn t the thel e eIL IL et it v. v vaults of i p q 8 state te which is Q loff and that tho prora pro- pro I ra tI G constitutional amendments I i to cr grab b this property for fori i ydo yO not UI us us' what this thi in- in bla 1 Js wealth consists of or orI or I it it is sJ oli or t the thi a. a amount o nt may this hll do oes not speak of uth x pt in th the particular d. d It 1 t hv another cartoon atc arc rc being carried d In Inbe Inbe Inbe be co country press which is hat enlightening It t. t 15 sa G a shaggy looking broom broom- ed d with a 0 twenty-million- twenty tax J I load purporting purporting- to b bo bothe tb the pon-Jand pon and and other property portrays JO several 1 hor es cs of ofer ofner ner er r. r specimen sleek and nd fat Batons with of ot K 1 income This i is very cn en- en ling hig Irn and d we we weare aro are arc glad gl to have u 2 O worth h qu r Yit t ith S fet income 7 use You ou from which 1 Ich h ut J 1 Iric income me b by individuals la In J fc 4 It e 1 1921 1 rJ r I in lna manufacturing 1 ra tc O fal farm i c 3 trad transportation PP 4 6 O cm m- m p average 1160 per year Ise and pt property perty income me WOO Interest rt de d. Income ome f from o o operations lons by individuals let tr rent nt tt t t ii u r I I Im- Im ui ri rent o of Own owned d Urban n homes ome and interest on on ott value alue Arable r b. b ii go goOds goodse in of otc m plus and gal gain m t In nv es eJ O gains in jim value of resi- resi realty r tty business and a d Indus Indus- v v i P i j or Wy dy of e bOY r figures figure's thid deception in the scare scare- v ments ts and iid cAr hia put HuV out oat by b th R Revision They rhy h have v led ild us UI to be- be pC ron on p page ge 6 G. I I i i SEN PATTERSON ON tAX FAX R REVISION VISION S b roh page 1 1 lie haVe V e. e hit of of aio in nt Ufah Utah which the bi ill big black hand of the Revision league league league-i. it is going to grab gral Whereas u it dearly clearly appears that this it is going to come chiefly from wages some lome fro from I farm arms urban homes and other then sources largely ly that pay a property tax But a avery very small matl per percentage will come com from income on the IB intangible i There Thera Is another deception in their heir argument It will be ob ob- observed served that of ot wages were vero vere veree e earned ned by es es at atan an n average wage v. v ae per year of 1160 It If f they in Sn fact fact- recover recover- the the the- wage wago earners and the home lome owners will pay more than three three fourths of whereas where where- I as s. s on the other ther hand the spell spell- I binders ers for tor the the them amendments m n in ts It tell ll the hom ionic owners and arid the wage earn earners rH that the lat the gl ingIe man man is s going goinS' t to be exempt exempt to the extent rot ot 1000 and Ulc man to the extent nt of 2000 a y year ar on his income t tax If It the the e are re allowed d which i is very doubtful un under er the I jutz- jutz theory of or taxation practically ally thc ic entire sum cairn will be bo It If the exemptions are not allowed d time the IB w wage wage- c c- earners and th the home homeowners homeowners owners win will pa pay the thc major maJOl portion In n addition to his 1111 present taxes Why Mr Mr Ir Tax Tat league Man and md wh hy Mr School Man Jan In your in in- campaign for tor the amend amend- meats do you oU not riot give the w wage sc earners and the home homo owners the facts acts Instead instead of ot camouflage And listen n Do Co yo you tell the school chool that they too oo will willbe wille be e required to pay an income tax when you demand of them a dolar dol dol- la ar for for- forone one of your yourl blue buttons If Jr Sll say 20 per cent of or the general property tax Is pai paid by salaried People upon their homes where do o these salaried people obtain ln the funds with which to pa pay th their lr taxes I If not from their salaries it It has been determined that between he be tween 10 and 15 per cent of ll public utility bills to consumers represents taxes Since a a. large percentage per per- of public utility service Is rendered to salaried people and since Ince between 10 and 15 per cent ot of f all public utility bills represent public utility taxes d does s not inot a a. considerable percentage of the thc taxes paid ald by public utilities s come caine from salarIes A great deal perhaps 50 0 per cent of ot the taxes paid upon personal property Is owned by salaried in In- In Then again take the wage earner earn earn- er cr r who lives in a rented house or oran oran or oran an apartment Is not hl his indirect tax ax in rent as certain and ond more than the direct tax paid by bythe bythe the he homo home owner There is a great deal Leal of or unjust clamor about the theman theman man who does not pay a direct tax taC ax when In fact tact he may be bo bearing bear bear- inS ing ng a heavy burden under an nn Indirect in indirect in In- direct tax From the foregoing analysis of ho the constitutional amendments and ho tho plan to make the same I live Ive it must be observed that the whole scheme is to open up the con ton for for- Cort t future ture taxation t to the end that the spenders may have more nore and more taxes as they may demand |
