OCR Text |
Show FIRST 11ISTRICT tOUUT. The llailarss Traiiiselnl In Hie Two Illi.-lo u of Hie llrit Illitrlcl. Tho following builiicM wan trans acted In Hid two divisions of the First Dlstrlst court on Haturdayi OULII..V. The first cvtio callc-J wai that of Catbeilno C. llelebeo vr. J 1'. I'.ui-mertsonetal. I'.ui-mertsonetal. In this nue nu order was Iniitd tefrrrliiK thu raru lo C. II. McIJIuro to lake the proofs uiid re-pott re-pott thu ovl luire to court. John Wheelwright ct al. as. tho Hlslen of the Holy Croat; all order Kramliu; defru lints live ds)a al dltlonsl lima to plead. O. K. llauoliter vs. Hu Wyoming I'aclit Imiruvement comisiuy; entry ofapteurancoof W. C. I.ane, and an order forubllcatlon of summons. Tho l'eoplo vs. V. 11. White; hear. Ing on charge of tontemi t. Adjudged guilty nud given Tour da)s m tho Weber couiityjsll. This la the end of the matter win ro Whilo figured rallier rons Icuouily In thu caie nf Crawford ts. Jloctli et nl., nut being an attorney at-torney In tho case. Tho caw of Bpauld-Ins, Bpauld-Ins, ttte Juror lu the samo case who was charged by ono McClure, nu l.vaniton bartender, with having iifKrod to sell out the Jury's verdict, was also brought up. Tno evidence; showed Hpnulalng entlnly Innocent an I was a little hard on McClure. John A. Taylor ct al vs. M. II. tin ford it al; motion for a new trial. Order that defendant pay the cost of suit and rlalnllfr given II vo days to pay T-WU or new trial will bognnted. (:. It. Ileal vs. Wllllim Lsiwc, ad mlulatrator; motion for new trial over ruled by consent. I.iclcn llaer it al. vs. Og ten 1'atnt, Oil and (llass cominy; motion for a trial nvirruleil. I). A. Cloulldrr vs. T. T. Honford; motion for now trial overruled. John H. Latham vs. William J. Hill; motion to rilas cents taken under ad vlKmeut. In flvo casu rgnlnat the Union Mi r cantlle cotnnan), motions wero male and argued to dissolve attachments, and were taken under ad vlsoiuent. 1'liuvo. It. M. Itogcrt vs. Dink Cook et al ; motion for new trial nverrulel. W. II. Mv va. N'et.hl Irrli.nllnn comranr; casu dlamlMeJ. The following dlvorco coms wcru dlamlued: CarpUuoRorenson vs. I. rjorensos; Angus Duller vs. MatllU lljtler; Jeaunctto Mctlregor vs. Charles Mo Uregor. Josephine Cantleon vs. Daniel Cant-Jeon; Cant-Jeon; divorce granted. Tho casu of Thomas Kojwler vs. Den Jamlu llachmaii wastrleil. The com plaint alleges that Marshal Ilarhmau ievleiluiou property belonghrg to Jos. A. Harris, upon whlc'i nn execution waa alruady held hy the plalutlir. Ca-e landing. |