OCR Text |
Show First District Court. The following cases were dispoed of before Judge James A. Miner In the iirst District Court yesterday: In the case of A. W. WerU vs Western Union Telegrapn Com piny; motion for a new trial argued and taken under advisement. United States vs Ollvus Jacobson; defendant withdrew pica ef not guilty and waived time and plead guilty, and asked far Judgment. Fine, S200 and cwts of suit, or In de'ault tbercjf six minth's im-(irionment. im-(irionment. Iu re-attendance of oflUial stenographer; order was made that the stenographer attends the sesjisn of this court during United estates ouiness and charge same to the United States. In the case of the Unit-d States vs. Iei 1. Wheeler; defendant plead guilty, waived timeand asked judgment. Imprisonment In ptul-tentiao ptul-tentiao twenty days. The case or the United States vs. James Kemp was dismissed. In re-delinquent jurors, K. R Tripp, Joeun Williams, W. B shews, A. .. Barnes, Geo. Bivler; ordered that writ of attachment be issued for the-e jurors and that a fine of $3 be entered against each of litem. In re-summons for petit jurors, order for ten additional was made. In the case of Mar,) McGratti vs. David G. Tallant; motion to set ni le judgment and verdict taken under advisement. In the caw of Mary McGrath -vs. David G. Tallant; five days' further stay of execution granted wherein to prepare bill of exceptions and statement of appeal. In the case of .the United States vs. .John Welch; defendant withdraws with-draws plea of not guilty and pleads guilty,walved time and asked judg-u-nt. Fine of $100 and co3ts. In default committed to penitentiary. In the case of the United States vs. Luke Sherwood, defendant withdrew plea of not guilty; took statutory time forsentence. In the case of the People vs. II. OlanJ, order was made for writ of attachment for Thomas Culley and George Proudfil, defaulting witnesses witness-es In tho case of the Ogden City Electric Light Company vs. Ogden City, order was made for defendant to show cause ?Cov.9.1S90, why an Injunction should not be issued. In the case ot A. W. Wertz vs. Ve.tern Union Telegraph Co ; motion to retax costs reheard: ordered or-dered that costs in this case up to Sept. 21, 1S90, ba awarded against defendaut, and all subsequent costs against plaintiff. The following petit jurors were empaneled. Thomas Frazler, John Kunz, Alfred Rose, Henry Hart-man. Hart-man. B C. Walton, I. K. Spalding, Mark Fletcher, Heber Orm, John Bradler, Charles McCorale, B. L. Doty, Willis Booth, Jr., John Everett, John W. Allen, B. A. Ilyhee, Aaron DeWitt, H. H. Smith, I. ii. Paulson, Edward Sjwell, ElUha Wilbur, Thomas Grant, John Gramer, Tho. Fryer and John Brown. Mary McGrath vs. David G. Tallant, Tal-lant, the motion of Maloney and Perkins to set aside judgment and verdict taken under advisement. Fi vo days stay of execution granted to prepare bill of exceptions and statement on appeal. Defendant excepts. Tito grand jury has thus far Ignored Ig-nored the following unlawful cohabitation, cohab-itation, polygamy and adultery cases, which were defended by Richards, Rolappand Barton: U. S vs. John Andrews, U. 8 vs. Fred Theurer, U. 8. vs. U. Tracer, U. S. vs. Thos. KIrby, U. S. vs. Wm. Reve, U. Svs. G. Thomas, U. S. vs. Jens Chrlstensen, U. 8. vs. Mary Hocnstrasser, U. 8. vs. Hans Munk, U. S. vs. Emma Mitten. |