Show charles allred guilty of grand larceny PRATT ALLRED AND CALVIN ARE ACQUIT D david JR rostron and calvin allred on trial the jury were out several hours on tuesday afternoon in the consideration I 1 of the case against abas allred and finally returned with a verdict of guilty as charged the case against pratt allred and calvert allred impleader pleaded im with aghas allred who on the same day was convicted came on next for trial the game counsel both sides that conducted the chas allred case conducted this andreas jenson was called and testified substantially as he did in the former case court adjourned until wednesday morning when harry candland was sworn he testified to the hauling of wool by the three allreda to chester station and of its shipment by them to nephi it was loaded at chester on the ad of july dont know anything about the four sacks belonging to jensen cross examined charles allred ordered one car it hold all the wool so a grain car was used for the rest calvert helped to load mart alarich was there but did not see him loading wool my attention was particularly directed to one sack which peter thompson claimed saw the alfreds allreds load this one on to the grain car soren christensen stated that he was railway agent in july last acted as clerk for chas allred while the latter was loading his wool there were twenty eight sacka hauled on july and 2nd to the station six or seven of which were hauled from bishop aureda AU reds mat Alc lrich chas allred pratt allred and calvert allred did the loading with mat baldrichs Ald richs wool there were about 38 sacks in all henry allred had a 9 sack lot and mat aldrich had 6 did not labow whose wool the 23 sack lot was there were 40 sacks in all taken to nephi for two sacks were thrown out as not belonging to the lot the wool was delivered to 0 andrews co I 1 represented aldrich saw among the 23 sack alyf that there were a few with mark on was present when charles allred drew the checks for the 23 sack lot pratt allred and calvert allred did not go to nephi dont know whether they had any interest in the 23 aach lot david mr thurman for defense stated that in consideration of the relations existing between this witness and the defendants he thought the court should instruct the witness as to his rights the prosecution explained that the witness would cat be d in any caso that may be on record in connection with these wool stealing cases witness testified that he and pratt allred owned the wool shipped at chester charles allred had no interest in it the wool was taken from my heep subsequently witness admitted that the sheep w ere not his but charles allreda ho and pratt had them on shares we had about pounds of wool from the sheep never hauled nor assisted in hauling any wool from barn there were 38 sacks loaded at chester 21 of them were mine some were marked J W co dont know where pratt allred got the sacks believe he got them from nephi the fleeces were marked with a blotch brand mr mark was a circle and a cross dont know for sure whether I 1 had any millers twine am sure that I 1 filled the Summer haya sacks with wool sheared from sheep we hadon had on shares the sacks were not all sewed alike but dont know that the 3 or 4 sacks differed there about 45 pounds of wool in our lot obtained from sheep wool sold for 20 cents per pound pratt was herding sheep when the wool was delivered at chester calvert assisted in loading he had sheep in say that I 1 never was at shoemaker Christense hs bam did not take four sacks of wool from that bam will swear that I 1 did not jid you ever write a letter to any one saving that you had taken wool from that barn objected to by defense objection overruled answer no sir Q you never wrote a letter to jacob johnson did you objected to objection sustained stated also that he had never written a letter to andreas jensen on the same subject he realized that he was testifying under oath and knew there a penalty for penury testified be fore the justice at moroni same he was testifying now never wrote to jensen on any subject nor did any one write to binm at my instance charles and I 1 most of alie wool from the herd thomas nanco charged with assault ith intent to commit murder appeared to plead and entered a plea of not guilty alie case was continued fur the term bonds vere fixed at 1000 court adjourned until 2 calvert allred one of the defendants was called to alie stand by counsel for the defense for the purpose of giving the prosecution pros cution opportunity of cross ex animation he stated to mr that lie biad not testified in the justices court to the deflect that lie did net know how much of the wool belonged to him 53 as his portion was not in partnership with anybody jdonte know where shoemaker Christen sens ham is remember where G M chris hensens ten sens barn is it has been pointed aut to me have never been in the barn henry allred aa a cousin of calverta and a brother of Pratt 8 heard conversation bean een calvert and david by which it vas understood that calvert was to get four pounds of wool a head on his fifty sheep A jensen recalled Know positively that calvert said at the examination that lie did not know which portion of the wool was hia cases set as follows omer call vs joel grover march albert ubold vs D S dinar march W M ormond vs F Argyle bj March isaac abbey vs W M ormond march I 1 the grand jury presented five indictments four under U S aws nl our under territorial laws bills against 3 A anna marks et al jolin T sullivan and levi S holdaway were ignored abo case against ton was deredon or motion of dist atta evans to be submitted to the next grand jury billington is alleged to have been connected with the attempted bank robbery at nephi on thursday morning the wool ing case against pratt aelred and cal vert allred was submitted to the jury without vit hout argument the verdict waa not guilty another wool stealing caad ass then taken up this time against david K and calvert allred the pret cious pair was accused of stealing a couple ofa acks of wool last July and belonging copter thompson from the Slat form of the railway station at cheater anepete county the wool having been placed there wit hother sacks two days priar by thompson for shipment to 0 4 y r s ii is nephi the alleged thieves undertook under cover of night to pack th two sacks of wool on the cars along with several others they claimed as theirs and were shipping away in the same direction that thompson was shipping his before the wool was transported however thompson reappeared and missing the two sacks went to work to hunt them up and discovered them among Eo and AIl reds branded with their marks this is the status of the case against these youthful ers and the testimony given in support of the prosecution seems to he of a character somewhat damaging to their professions of innocence the trial occupied the whole of yesterday this morning at 9 court opened when sir hiles began the arguments G sutherland and J johnsoa following mr evans delivering the clos in argument court took recess till when the case will be given to the jury |