Show HAWKE AND ANDREWS CASE I Reversal as to the FivcHundred I r Dollar Obligation In the case of the Salt Lake City I Browing company appellant vs Hawko Andrews a peculiar state of aflfalrs Is presented Hawke Andrews An-drews were conducting a saloon at Frisco Fris-co and were being assisted by the brewing F brew-ing company In August 1900 Hawke applied to the company for 500 In cash and at the same time ordered certain cer-tain goods Both orders were filled by the company and when the goods and the money reached Frisco Hawke took the 5500 and left the country The brewing company then sued the partnership part-nership for the 500 and the goods and 4 the lowor court while finding that the parties were jointly liable for the goods held that the remaining partner was 43i1 not liable for the 500 talcen by Hake Justice Bartch who writes the opinion I opin-ion holds with Chief Justice Miner nnd Justice Baskin concurring that the L Judgment should be reversed so far as it relates to the 500 obligation and so orders |