Show ioPiNIoNs GIVEN IE Supreme Court Turned Out a Heavy Run HONORS WERE DIVIDED Two Cases Affirmed and Two He vorssd Lower Court Affirmed inCase in-Case of Wilson as Trustee in Bankruptcy Bank-ruptcy for John Beck vs J A Cunningham al Affirmation in Toltec Ranch Case Reversal in LL Part in Hawke Andrews Case Bsvorsal in Lilly Mining Case 1b The Supreme court handed down four opinions yesterday anirmatlons and reversals re-versals being evenly divided J4 The most Interesting case passed iz upon from a financial standpoint at t 7 least Is that of E Wilson trustee i Jn bankruptcy for John Beck appellant I S vs J A Cunningham et al f 3 The action was brought by Wilson in 1 the lower court to recover from Cunningham I < Cun-ningham 51000 shared oc BullionBeck I stock subject to certain Hens It being 1L alleged in brief that Cunningham held tile stock as security for moneys advanced ad-vanced by him to Beck and that Becks I creditors were entitled to any equity remaining re-maining therein after the payment of the liens Becks story was to the effect tiTh ef-fect that on May 11 1SH9 the date upon Which his 61000 shares of stock were ti advertised for sale In satisfaction oC jb a Judgment for 24500 In favor of aIrs a-Irs Evcrhard he paid her 500 for 13 a postponement of the sale for four i hours and promised Cunningham a p bonus of 15000 If he would satisfy the 1z judgment arid allow him to redeem the mock when able This he says Cunningham Cun-ningham agreed to do and did do 5 Cunningham Insisted that he purchased j pur-chased Becks Interest In the stock outright out-right and exhibited a bill of sale for It At this time the stock with the title to certain real estate which was gold later for about 05000 was In the hands of a trustee and there were claims against the whole for 284000 1 less certain dividends claimed upon the hI stock R r I K The only question In the case was as IlL to whether or not the bill of sale was absolute and the lower court held that It was Chief Justice Miner who writes the opinion with Justices Bartch and Basin Bas-in concurring holds that this Judgment i Judg-ment was righteous and should be affirmed I af-firmed |