Show CITY HAD MONET I Could Have Paid 818000 on Weaver Judgment Receiver Weaver of the Bear River Irrigation Ir-rigation and Ogden AVuturworks company la out after the citys scalp and Is likely to make them trouble unless they promptly prompt-ly pay his claims for hydrant rental at tho limit or the extension of time given them by Judge Rolapp Mr Weaver he was aroused some days ago when ho noticed In an evening even-ing paper a call to pay city warrants signed by Treasurer Moycs and thereby hangs a tale On September 10th the city was cited Into court to show cause why they should not proceed at once lo pay Mr Weavers claims In cash ho having refused a warrant The city appeared and set up in defense that they had no money on hand upon which the matter wilE continued The very next day September Sep-tember 17thi the above notice appeared calling upon the holders of all warrants from No 12017 to 22814 URKregatlng 15 000 to present them for payment to the City Treasurer and they would 10 paid Mr Moycs was Been regarding the matter mat-ter and stated that he knew but little about it that he had been absent from the city and had only returned on the morning of the ICth and had Issued the call for warrants which ho had ordered published Ho admitted however that there was money In the general fund at the time but could not state exactly how much but stated that It was specifically spe-cifically provided hy statute that such money should bo uned for the redemption of warrants and that ho had slmplyfol lowed out the law |