Show iii o MPHERSON LOSES Demurrer to Colored Mans Complaint Sustained COURT PUTHIMOFF THE JUR i J r Judge Chciry Holds that McPhcrson Has no Cause of Action Against Juror UcCarrlck and that it Was the Judge who Prevented McPhcr son from Serving on the Bcnbrook jury Verdict for Lambourne Against Hnlfin for 1650 forSer vices Rendered 4 A demurrer uns yestet day argued In die ease of J Gordon MoPherson vs I Ed McCarrlck In which the plaintifC I i a colored man fought to recover 50i > 0 I I damages alleged lo have betn sus I tainod by him on account of die do I fondant objecting I lo him I sitting on lie Jury because he vafi a mgro In tho case of John II Minbmok on trial for the murder of Burton h Morris The HI ten men t wis made for the dq murrer by 1 Attorney S II LewlM and against it by Attorney G W Moycr Thi cieniuirer wns based on tlio a lie gallon that the complaint did not state I fuiMH Mifllelenl to eonsdtute a cause of 1 action an 1 the t cuurt sustained It 1 holdIng hold-Ing that McPherson was excluded from herre nn du Hinhrnok Jury by 1 order of lie cull ii Y mid dial alt hiotigli McCai i rl < Mc l itity have made tiJCt ion to I sit with jMoPherson as a fellowJuror the ulllinalf jietion IIK by I I he Judge 1 who had lie right lo xcupr aOy Juror wliose preKPiico neemed to the court to exoixiM an influence either for oik > nsalnsl lie I defendant In sustin lining the dmuricr die rourl allowed I lie plaintiff ten days in wliIiit to elect either to stand on Ihe demurrer or to lila an amended complaint I |