Show 1 Vrllcs lor tho Famll k t J C Op nHhaw on behalf of tho I family of Jo oph Bridge has written iJ I t n communication to The Tribune in regard I re-gard to the story which appeared two weeks ago on the psychological aspect 1 1 1of the crimes for which Joseph Bridge tin + E fuul George Parry wore sentenced to i the penitentiary In the article It was i noted aa u utrangc fact that two young f men who had been acquaintances In r js youth should commit the same crime l bout the name time ami be sentenced l to tho penitentiary within two months 1 1 of ono fcnothcr Mr Opcnshaw writes cI that tho family of Bridge feel z v rc C I ft llcctlon hos been cast upon them by 0 the association of Bridge and Parry in the story and the Intimation conveyed t con-veyed that Bridge had demoralized 0 t Parry No such Intimation was Intended Intend-ed There Is I nothing to show that S cither consciously influenced the other T On the contrary it Is pretty well established I S estab-lished that the men had not exchanged a word for tour years The feature ot the story was that a strange parallel H existed between the two men both as 1 to their environment and conduct and sJ p It woo left to the student of criminology i t crim-inology to puzzle out the psychological S cause of the coincidence |