Show liTIHATIUN OVER M1NE Trial of Famous Case Is 1 I Begun at Mephi II I i i WILL BE LONG LEGAL BATTLE 1 Attorneys on Both Sides Are Not Cnl culating to Get Through Before Chilstmas Number of Affidavits Presented First Day Judge srarl i oneaux States That Verdict Returned Re-turned Against the Oregon Short Lino in Favor of Walter S Cor bctt Is Excessive f TUIBUNE SPECIAL r Nophl Utah Nov IS When Judge Marioneaux announced at 1 oclock this morning that the next case for tiial was that of the Grand Central IVlfiiing company agiilnfct the Mammoth I j Mining company iicsais Brown and I Henderson and W Hi Dlokson Kd Loose and Lafayette Holbrook on the I part of the Grand Centrul and Judge I Zuno John M Zane and Col Picket and T W Jennings and Sam Mcintyre on the part ot the Mammoth were I I within the bar Mr John M Zane arose aud said before TpZ1nenrosc fore the case WUH called for trial they dOMlrcd to present a motion which had been served on tlju other side The amendment usked to be made consisted consist-ed In this that under the amended answer and counter claim au It stood tho line by 1 which the Mammoth company com-pany claimed the ivpex of the vein under un-der Its counter claim was 1100 feet from the southerly end line of lot 28 the Claim known as the first Northern extension ex-tension o the Mummoth This amendment amend-ment would advance that line to a point 1700 feet from the Southerly end line Also some other amendments weic proposed which simply were mat ter of more accurate description of tho apex or location of the apex of the Mammoth Vein Judge Henderson asked till D oclotk l to present affidavit In opposition to the amendment which wes granted S At 2 oclock an allldavlt of great length was read and Mr Zane on behalf be-half of the Mammoth asked for un adjournment ad-journment till tomorrow morning to file counter atlldavlts to some of the facts St < out In the Grand Centrals aflldavJt which was allowed A hard light IH I expected and the attorneys are not calculating tb get through before Christmas The attorneys have ordered or-dered Mr Cooke the court reporter tp Get out all the testimony as the case I progrosHeu and to hire such assistance D will bu necessary for him to have 1 each days proceedings written out by D oclock the following day BELIEVES VERDICT EXCESSIVE Inthe case of Walter S Corbett against the Oregon Short Line the court said the t verdict was excessive ifl i view of the ill W which emulates the amount of damages In t case where u parent sued on account of the death of an infa child and that if the plaintiff plain-tiff would remit so much of the Judgment Judg-ment a 0 was necessary make It stand at 0100 that amount would not be excessive and there would then be no reason i why a new trial should then be granted The ° court further stated that he would pass finally upon the motion for a new trial on November 25th and that In thq r meantime plaintiffs plain-tiffs counsel should be notified of the courts suggestion in the premises The verdict rendered by the jury in this case was for 15100 esTHER es-THER CAS CALLED In the case of Eureka City vs R G Wilson and Owen Dusenberry defendants defend-ants objection to the introduction of 1 any evidence under the complaint was I sustained and the plaintiff is given ten days to file an amended complaint Samuel E Nellson against Nebo Brown Stone company motion for anew a-new trial was overruled Kobert Baker vs Eureka Hill company com-pany motion for n new trial overruled I Tlmolhy Downey vs Andrew Johnson John-son motion for a new trial overruled Andrew Johnson vs Eureka Hill Mining Mi-ning company motion for a new trial I granted |