Show i ASKS RELEASE FROM BOND I Senator Clark and Son nnd Hinze II i S Fall Out I TRIBUNE S115CIALJ I Helena Mont April 13 Counsel for j I United States Senator W A Clark and I I his son Charles W Clark late this atternoon filed a petlllon In the Su premejjourt praying for an order releasing re-leasing thorn from further responsibility responsibili-ty as sureties on the bond of F Augustus Au-gustus Helnze In the famous Pennsylvania Pennsyl-vania case Their aggregate liability I on the bond which was given to secure the Boston and Montana company Is 375000 The Clarks say that Ilclnzc by false representations as to the value of his assets Induced them to go on his bond t They will make a similar application i on the same ground in the Federal Court on Monday for nfi order releasing them from liability as sureties on other of Helnzes bonds The liability of Senator Clark and his son on Helni 4 bonds aggregates about 1000000 The action of the Clarks In asking to be relieved from any further liability ns sureties on Helnrcs bond does not come as a surprise During the Legislature Legis-lature the breach between Clark and Hclnssc was widened unlll there was unt no possibility of Us being bridged The two worked against each other on all f subjects of legislation except the elght hour bill Clark Identifying himself with the Amalgamated Interests Tho fight began at the beginning or tho session when IIolnze threatened to defeat I de-feat Clark for election as Senator unless un-less ho assisted Jlelnze In carrying I legislation designed to help him In pending prospective litigation Clark would make no agreement and Hclnze ballot did prevent his election on the first balot In their petition today the Clarks state that since Helnzo represented to I them that he was worth 10000000 facts have come to their knowledge that led them to belIeve his statement wa false They allege that on March 20th Helnze sold a five thirtysixths Interest In-terest In the Nipper for a rntich less amount than he had formerly represented repre-sented It to be worth thakhe disposed of large Interests In the State having sold the L E R parts bf tho Nipper and other mines The petitioners further allege that since securing the big bond In the Pennsylvania case Helnze has ceased working In the Raius and Johnston mines and Is concentrating hIs energies ener-gies to taking out ore lOt the PennSylvania Penn-sylvania that at present he Is taking l out more ore than his smelters can treat and has at least 10000 tons sacked for treatment and that his monthly I net revenue from the Pennsylvania Penn-sylvania amounts to 110000 The court set no date for the hearing of the petition S |