Show SENATOR CLARKS CASE SENATOR CHANDLER SUBMITS SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT Replies to the Strictures Upon the Committee jffado by the Senator lnHis Rcccnt1 Speechr1 w Washington June C Senator Chandler Chand-ler from the ConniUce on Privileges and JEIections today presented a supplemental sup-plemental report on the case of Senator Clark of Montana replying 10 the strictures upon the committee made by Senator Clark in his speech and also to the minority report In the case made by Senators IJfarrls and Pertus With reference to6 Mr ClurKs statements the committee says The distinct criticisms made by Mr Clark on May 15th of the report of the commutes are not serious in their character and it is fortunate that they were made because they may be taken as being among the crUclmns which the party most at Interest can claim can justly be made Tho correctness of all other statements made by Inc corn mitj not criticised by Senator Clark may be taken lo be admitted by him The report then takes up and replies seriatim to Mr Clarks criticisms the charges being either denied or reasons given Replying to the charge of un judicial methods of proceeding the committee asserts hint these wore only resorted to to discover additional testimony testi-mony and that the statements tluia admitted were not permitted to inllu encc the result The methods of lie coinmltlco were In no sense unfair says the report but were such as ordinarily prevail In investigations like Jhls The prouinp lion of Innocence was at no tlmo disregarded dis-regarded antI lie il ml Ings favorable to Mr Clark were made ati a court or Jury would have made them upon a full and fair consideration of all the facts in the case The committee stands by l its original origi-nal position that Mr Clark was from the beginning of the campaign a candidate can-didate for the Senate and says that nothing since the hearing closed hap tended to impair the facts stated concerning con-cerning Senator Clarks own personal connection with tho course of his canvass can-vass for election as Senator Senator Chandler as chairman of the committee adds a memorandum of his own in refutation of the statement of the minority lint the chairman left the committee little to do This crlll cism he says Is unjust and he add The chairman did nothing except what such an officer la expected to do nvcry Important ruling was made cither by division of lie committee or by the chairman In the first Instance after an order of the commllleu was made prescribing that course of proceeding pro-ceeding with the understanding that any member of the commit lee might dissent on the point and have It decided de-cided by the vote of the committee Ha also averts that so far nH Senator Sena-tor Clark was concerned there was no refusal to summ6n any witness whom his counsel insisted upon obtaining |