OCR Text |
Show THE mm (IE A Chilly Cay Dampens the Ardor of Counsel, Court and Uliint Eunuing Through the Calendar. THE RUSH FOE 0ITIZEU3HIP. Judge Blackburn Puts Somi Very Pertinent Perti-nent Questions Before the Candidate-Summary Candidate-Summary of tho Day. Tho second day of tho June term opened with Chief Justice Zane and Associates As-sociates Mmer and lilackburu on the bench. It was a cold day for court and client. A pitcher of ieo water and a riotous wind rattled the window punea and chilled eyerythinc. Tho cry for beat and the order to turn on steam brought no word from tho liremen, and rubbing their palms tho judges reconciled themselves them-selves to tin) clammy service of the weather clerk. Hus'iness was dispatched and the following orders made: Lewis et al vs. Kinney et al; motion for new hearing denied. Ravbold et al vs. 1 lardy et al: motion for new trial denied, Justice Zane dissenting. dis-senting. Thomas It. Higgina vs. Salt Lake City etal; by agreement of counsel continued contin-ued for the term. Theresa Nichols et al. vs. The Union Pacific Hallway company; submitted. Cajelaiu Dueheneaii vs. Ugden City et al; appeal dismissed. Horn; Sling vs. The National Assurance Assur-ance company of Irelaud; briefs submitted. sub-mitted. Jasper M. Nelson vs. Peter C. Iirixen; motion to dismiss withdrawn by con-j con-j sent of counsel to await the action of ! Judge Powers. Arguments were then taken up in the case of Cynthia K. Jones vs. Jane Mom-mott, Mom-mott, an appeal from the Jirst dislrict on an action involving certain real es- Inl. Following this is the case of Martha Cook vs. VV. K. Crnndall et al. The settings lor tomorrow are The People vs. Louis Colin. I.e Grand Young and F. S. Richards for relators anil Dickson & stone and Parley L. Williams for appellants. Hong Sling vs. The National Assurance Assur-ance company of Irelaud. U. J. VVen-ner, VVen-ner, Maloney it Perkins, ilvans & Rogers, Rog-ers, Bennett, Marshall & lirrilley. |