| OCR Text |
Show H 0 Iragglsts' License Case I Set For January 28th Hue linnhlng ('ll)'s ltllit to (Imiit H or ItofiiHO License Set H for llenring. H Tho Hrlggs Pharmacy case, whoroln Bon right of tho city to grant or ro-Hfaied ro-Hfaied a druggist's license is Involved, l( this week Bet for honrlug on Jan. HHth. It Is u case for which there Is Ho precedent, or nt lenBt so far ns the state, of Utah 1b concerned. H There aro Bovoral questions to be Hiettlcd Ouo Is whether tho ordln- nco Itself is constitutional, but In as much us tho city Is not pleading tho Hordlnnncp, this question may not Hcomo up The Pharmacy pcoplo will contend that hecnuBo an omployeo or an of- Deer commltto n misdemeanor, is no reason why a corporation should be refused n llcenso, oven If tho offender should happen to own n largo block of stock In tlio corporation. Tho city, however, will contend -that tho law thing it tTir, right to regulati; busl- "csb, implies that It Imu tho right to either grant or lefuso licenses. An- other contontlou by tho Pharmacy People, win bi' that tho city will In I ''topped from citing tho conviction of Mr Hrlggs as a ronson for refuslnc the license, becauso tho city, after this olTence wiib committed, several times wanted him a license I Mr Hrlggs Ib not now oven a Btoek- holder In the Institution, so that if tho case on tho docket now goes ngnlust I Win, the Hrlggs I'liarnuicy compan I WU again ask for a llconso and the e win m started all over again. I J Tiacey Wootton will roprnsent "'' druggiBts, while .liulgo .1 W N I Whitocution will look after the Inter-I Inter-I ts of i ho city |
