Show i I Further Complications Threat Threatened Threatened ened In En Dr Park Estate 4 4 1 PROF CLAIM 4 d t b WAS PROMISED or OF PROP I f fI ERTY BUT CUT OFF OPP I Another shadow of litigation hovers over the John R Park estate estat and fur further furJ further J L ther complications are in sight It is fi I Iw W G Roylance and Mrs Roylance i the latter a foster child of the late educator who was not included by mention In hi the will wUl who are now dis r satisfied with the turn things thing have taken who openly accuse Dr Park of ot I deception and who will in all proba probability have to seek in order 1 to establish e their rights Professor sor Roylance an instructor at atthe atthe z the University was assistant state su superintendent perin ton dent of public nubile instruction un under under under der Dr Park and his man Sirs Mrs Roylance was raised in the doc doe t rs home and has been at his side elde f practically since she was 9 years ears old She he was a great favorite with her fos tf t tr r and the duties pertaining to the household devolved largely upon her One day last year she and her husband were called into Dr Parks room at the home on North State street and arid the story df di what trans transpired transpired transpired there was told last evening by Prof Professor or for the first time Dr Park told us said Mr lIr Roy lance Jance that he did not expect to live a great while longer and he was about to make his will Aften Atten some further talk he asked us if we would accept this home as Mrs share of the thc estate I said that personally I thought it was very generous of ot him and my wife expressed the same sa e senti sentiment mont ment But the doctor then asked if that war wa enough We Ve replied that it surely aurely would meet our requirements and give ghe us the greatest satisfaction sa as an acknowledgement of Mrs lances s services in the house Remembered In First Will But you ou have always admired that Jot lot on Ninth East said the doctor and amI I am going to give you that also aiso So It was settled and in his will made at that time we were given the two vo pieces of property It was I who suggested the endowments to the Uni one for the library of Amer 1 kan an history and literature and the theother theother theother other for the teachers fellowship They v were ere both adopted by b the doctor Thinking of course cou e that my wife aid ald I would come into possession of the State street property continued Professor Roylan e we set about im improving improving improving proving it expending several hundred dollars The doctor died We T still be believed believed believed the gift he had volunteered was genuine and when the will was finally published giving his entire estate to the University and excluding his fos foster foster foster ter children although Mrs Irs Roylance I 1 was not one of those mentioned as being excluded d it was like a thunder thunderbolt thunderbolt bolt to us We Ve thought there had been Jeen some Scale mistake but it seems not Deception Was Practiced Had we been excluded from any in tere t in the property in the first place it would have hae been Jeen no Injury to our feelings but what shocked us u was the deception practiced by Dr Park He Het t went to work and made a new will July Jub 3 and kept its contents entirely 1 secret from us well knowing what our expectations were also that we had expended money on the property It wag ivaa evidently a case of intentional de deception deception and it is the first time either r of us has known Dr Park to attempt to deceive anyone an one oneo o What will we do repeated Professor r sor Roylance In answer to the ques question question tion Veil Well we learned that the prop property property property erty on Ninth East which is near Twelfth South and alongside Canyon creek and worth perhaps 2000 had been placed in escrow by the doctor and would revert to us Ug when certain i conditions were complied with Among other things we were to sign receipts for all aU claims we might have against the estate It was left as a cold bust bus business busness ness ne s proposition The title to the prop property property erty cr was as clear until Mrs Irs Hiltons claim became known It is now clouded Mrs Hiltons Interference We Ye were willing to accept that piece of land under the terms of th tl tbS will in escrow row until Mrs Hiltons intentions were announced and we then placed the matter in th tirs hands of an attorney He Be advised ed with Mrs Hiltons counsel with wIlh a view to having her relinquish all aU right to that piece of land and do any an probability of a contest with us This they are not ready to do their answer being received today toda and WId what we will do next remains to be seen It ie is I practically certain that the Roy lances will let Mrs Irs Hilton HUton tight light it out with the UnIel ity regents and if the th will wUl Is IB broken will then present their claim against the estate The legal aspect of the case is entirely in the hands of attorneys for Mr Ir and Mrs Roylance and those who are familiar with tha th facts and the law assert issert that they thea have hav an excellent opportunity of winning |