Show WITH iTH HUSBAND j Some SODIe Interesting Developments in ill Case 4 1 MRS MUS BULLOCKS DIVORCE I 1 I HER HR HUSBAND WAS UNABLE ABLE TO 0 WA UL 4 George W V Parra t an aged employee e of the shop department dep nt of the Din Dinwoodey woodey woo ey Furniture company made such sucha a showing showIng before Judge Hall Hal yesterday when he hE answered the a of his attorneys to require him to pay his hi wife Minerva Minera A Parra tem tern temporary alimony almony and counsel fees ees that It won for him the favor avor of 61 f the court Mrs instituted her suit snit on Juarch harch 6 5 for divorce alimony aUmon and the custody custod of or the three minor n alleging that her ber husband had subject subjected ct pd ed d her to extreme cruelty This alle alie allegation ale gation gatlon gaton the defendant denied although it i was wa admitted that he had occasion occasionally occasionally ally aly disagreed with Ith his wife The rhe part parties parties ies les were married marr d twentynine years ago The hearing yesterday was not upon the merits of the case Cae but some mat matters matter tens ter were developed which tended to show that Mr also als had hai ha a grievance v vance ance It I was related by the fhe defel defendant dant and not contradicted that he lie had bad long ago deeded his homestead ani all al he lie possessed to his children subject only to his wiles life interest Moreover he had constantly constanty turned nearly all al hl of his wages weekly over to his wife wie I tor lor the family maintenance and even last week had done so When Then it i came caine ce to a declaration by II the thc defendant under that he and Mrs had continued to live together as s husband and wife since the he date the plaintiff commenced her suit sui for divorce di divorce divorce vorce and alimony and that this rein rela relation tion ton still sti continues the coult w wi sur sun surprised The surprise resulted in Judge Judg Hall Hal denying the motion moton to require Mr Mi I to pay temporary alimony almony nail and ant counsel fees to his wife wie r I Smith Walon Walton presented the motion moton to the court for Mrs rs ant At Attorney Attorney Attorney torney VV V T Gunter appeared as a coun counsel tel sel el for tor her nero husband If I the ruling of the court yesterday is to be taken as an indication of Low Lowthe Lowthe Lowthe the case cae will wU be decided upon its m and in view of the fact that Judge Hall Hal has set the precedent of denying di divorces divorces i ivon von es when insufficient cause shown it is not improbable that Mrs ht aratt will wIl be unsuccessful In securing a a ae de decree e I of cree separation with alimony |