| OCR Text |
1 tI Ir1bf Ir i tOllT i j j 23W 0 J W irtz > itjt rMc4i Ii o j ew LJuwm Ander i 1 wnwm1 Jt1tiw eaen > r r TL T A V H HUTOCXM > U JfcFkt8 = < > tiii 7t f i D Tr if i 1 3 t I 4 t < li 2POR t 1RIAs VErRRlflMBD By JEDGB JBARTCH 3 r t i > 15 Vivt j > < l TC r v Roberto McFiirlahi inil James Jbf KImbeil T t7i Veber Colmty Pti atloit lWWrliVo t JlaulateAgahtlt > tJi CsiH l rOBTi Defend hOIfA 1 wer in the Suit o Aaroh I Ke tii s 1 KclMC j k Gilicsv 1 I the tJtafe Au r8 i1 mjuillird1 al I t i L 1 r1 S < Bartchs divlsksii ol thernW dteferfcb cemrt iaa > been rather jjn 3 kncfethe cWj of Oie Sppicmbes term ind sisjlikeiyito > rem re-m livso f until after the Chri tinasJ h liars l-iars itls honprwas dfctefly occupied ye terdaywththejiieftringr f motions for new ffeials J andfajTnal matters i = I Aatlcron II SsItnir lieach In tnecaafe of William Anderson vs The altair Beach Railway com anti rao an-ti foe < anew < fMal raU argued r The suit Tvas brought 1 io reoover StLmegeg from the railreaft company i lor the death of the InfaSit child of the plaintiff it being alleged hat Xhe defendant de-fendant company maintained a certain bridge over the Jordan river in an un guarded manner aiiU as u consequence the child fells frpiro the bridge into the rlvef and Trasriircwneu A verdict nvag I found for the defendants and the plaintiff plain-tiff moved fof a new trial on the ground of errors in the judges charge AH ply John M T5anexappeared in support of the motion antL Attorney P S Richards against it After hearing the arsuments his honor took it under aflyisement 4 Motions For Sew Trials Overruled Judge Bartch yesterday handed down his decision on the motioji for new triale ia the cases of Joseph Holt vs C E Pearson and Alexander Rogers vs JohnW Donnellan In both cases the motions were overruled and a stay of 60 days granted to prepare statement state-ment on appeal Permission was given to use statements on motions for new trials upon motions on appeal Short Order Jane Nixon Slioles Henrietta Yea don et judgment and order of foreclosure fore-closure enterd for plaintiff by default Mary E Frost et al vs Emeline E Hussell et al motion for new trial passed by consent W H Roy et al TS F J McIAugKi 3in et aJ demurrer to complaint passed by consent Richard A Luwe vs Elizabeth Show ell motion to retax sts continued by consent George TV Mowry jet al vs H A Fyler demurrer to second amended complaint argued and submitted C L Sanford vs T J Drake erG al I motion for a new trial partially argued and continued until today More Writs of Prohibition Robert 3JcFariand and James N Kimball yesterday filed petitions in the Third district court for writs of pro hibition against the Utah commission McFarland was a candidate for elec tion to the constitutional convention I from West Welder precinct Weber county and Kimball was a candidate for election to the same convention from the Fifth Ogden precinct in the county of Weber They both make I the usual allegations that they were duly elected and pray for writs of mandate to compel the commission to issue them certificates of election The I writs were issued returnable Dec 31 Tutlnm enls Entered Thomas F Mulloy vs Charles L McKibben for the plaintiff for 18713 The Siegel Clothing company vs I Peoa Coop for the plaintiff for 67865 I On a rrouiij ory Note i The State Bank of Utah Is suing I Mathoni W Pratt to collect 71665 on a promissory note |
