OCR Text |
Show CASES SET FOB THE I SEPTEMBER AND I OCTOBER COURT In the setting of cases this morning, morn-ing, Judge James A Howell announced an-nounced that but few civil cases will be heard in October as most of the time of the court will be taken up v ith criminal cases. It Is expected that one or two cases against Joseph Henry Martin, one charging robbery and the other charging an attempt to destroy the home of L. R. EScc)es bv the use of nitro-glycerine, will be beard. These cases wen- continued) lor the September term under agreement, agree-ment, it being understood that the attorney for the defendant in the Mar ' tin assault case, tried in Ogden last spring, is to argue his appeal before i the supreme court In the early part Of October lr in also possible that some of the cases against Dr. N l. Estes, charged with prescribing for ami selling co , caine and morphine, will be taken up ' lor trial. There are four cases against Fstes all of which were continued this morning for the September term The rases set this morning follow Consolidated Wagon ft Machine Oo. u-. C G Porter, et a!., law, Septem I ber 29 Louise Conwaj vs. Salt Lake Og- den Ry Co., law. September 24. Utah Light & Railway company vs. j Volker Lumber company. September Septem-ber 14 Berend Van der Schuit vs Ogden City law. Se)tember U Bo?r of Medical Examiners vs. F J Freenor, law, September 18. Florence W Cunningham vs Lewis: I Cunningham, divorce. September 9. Kmma C Haley vs Thomas Haley, divorce, September 22. Oliver Wood vs. Dora B Topham, law. September 16. Wmnifred H McCool vs J. P O'Neill Construction company, law. September 11 W. R. Kirchoff vs Phoenix Con struction company, appeal, September Septem-ber 10 James J. Smyth vs. James Pingree. appeal. September 23 Ralph E Hoag. administrator vs The United States Fidelity ft Guar antep company, law, September 21 Fred A Brophy vs. Ogden Rapid Transit company, law, October 2 Fred Manning vs. Fred Voorhees. appeal. October 5. Alonzo B Van Patten vs Leo Q I McKlnney law, October fi |