Show collins says enemies want to get him in penitentiary victoria S C july 13 george D collins fought hard although unavale angly this afternoon before judge lapman to prevent a remand being taken to allow of officials and witnesses arriving from san francisco to prosecute him tor perjury in connection with the suit brought him in the superior court at san francisco by charlotta newman ano claims that collins married her on may 16 1889 and his later marriage to clarice mccurdy at chicago was bigamous his application for dismissal as the warrant was detective was not granted and was remanded tor six days to allow 0 o officers arriving to conduct extradition proceedings collins was permitted by judge lampman to address the court in bis own behalf following at koreny H D helmchen Hel mcKen who Is conducting his cabe collins addressed judge lampman advancing objections to ahe validity ot the information upon the warrant for which his arrest was issued and outlining the california law affecting perjury he and his counsel held the warrant secured tor his arrest was void as it omitted to state the perjury to bo wilful they held this omission was fatal they further objected that it was not shown that the perjury was committed before an official with jurisdiction ris to try the case in connection with which it was alleged to have been committed that it is not shown that colling was sworn and that it was not shown that the alleged perjury was material which Is necessary under california laws while unnecessary under canada laws prank acting tor the san francisco police produced authorities to show iho accused could be held without a sworn statement that per judy had been committed without details being specified and quoted several extradition cases before canadian judges in support the judge said he considered the warrant sufficient to hold collins and remanded him tor sla days an arrangement was made so that collins will not be held in jail but in the custody of a special officer whose expenses will be paid by him collins in an interview said he considered the proceedings the work of conspiracy against him at san francisco this conspiracy was the work of a powerful minority including both bench and bar the indictment against him was secured by the conspirators because the judge who presided over the grand jury which indicted him was a man who sought to ruin him because hs had the judge impeached before the state governor for conduct unbecoming to the bench another judge worked against him because he had strongly taken the judge to task in the interest of a client and another was opposed to him because he had upset many ot the judges decisions on appeal and the press conducted a campaign of calumny against him his activity in support of the had also antagonism and knowing that ha had been prejudiced and waa likely to be railroaded to the pen llen alary he fled from san francisco WIN SUIT bort huron mich july 13 judge I 1 iwan Iw ln the circuit court today litand ed down his opinion in the case of dan st claere against the knights of of ahe world in which wineland protested against the galss in rates adopted by the supreme tent at its biennial review in detroit a year ago judge george law dismissed the bill of complaint with costs to the defendant the decision was based on the clause in the laws of the supreme tent governing applications tor membership which reads as follows this application under the constitution and laws of the supreme tent now in force or that may hereafter be adopted are made the sole basis of the contract between myself and the supreme tent |