OCR Text |
Show EMPL0YER8 RI0HT8 OIIIEr; DISTRICT COURT'S RULING WASHINGTON", I). C, Sept. 1 Tlmt tho right to unionist does not supersede nu emplojer's right to dictate dic-tate terms of Miijilo) ment and that an euitloxer has the nght to dun barge ouiplo)M wlio join u labor union or coin imiH membership tlierem tiguinst his xxishtM is the etfeet of n deeision todit) b) Justice Sublimit of the dis-triit dis-triit supremo court. This reiiinrkitlilo deeisiou was ineonrHtiHl in demul of an injuutlion to thu member of the Hrotherluiod of llnilrond Trainmen ngiiinst the. WnshliiKton nnd Old Dominion to'prexent ifist barge of uiu ploxes .ifilliatiMl with thu union. "The right to labor la n personal right," dichmw tho court, "which in-linn in-linn in the intlixidiml and ns n corollary cor-ollary to the right not to work, must equally be rceognUed. Hut xwth tho recognition of thoso lights there is Miiother right xx lilt h belongs to the umphi)cr and that nght Is ono to im-KM im-KM conditions upon those who sick emploment trom n gixen omiiloer, be that employer an indixldiiul or u toriHirutiou ''It mu) be asked wbut btvomos of thu right of mplo)Ni to orgiinixu, if, as a consequence of doing so, tho em-po)er em-po)er ma) oxereiso his rluht, ns recognized re-cognized b) the Unitwl States supreme su-preme court, lliu answer ma nut bo wisy to formulate, but this court is not enlled upon to miswer tho question ques-tion "Its duty Is to gixo effect to tho nuthontatixu opinions and decisions of tho supreme tribunal, which gixo the company thu right to dismiss its employes if they join ft lalrr union. ' |