OCR Text |
Show off the record Do you think the city's impact fee should be waived in the historical district to encourage new construction? 4 - imii-i ' i I f r $ - f I 1 . I .Z- - tr ' . 4 i, f . c ' 5s Xm;- A kd tin am-m tm j t : : 3 , 1 I v I ! N I Paul Becker, owner of Rosie's Delicatessen I think it should be mainly to encourage new building. Most of the services are already here. Waiving the impact fee would be a good incentive for people to build in the historical district. . Joann Hays, Skyline Realty That sounds like a pretty good idea. People should be encouraged encourag-ed to build on Main Street. They need all the help they can get. There really haven't been too many new buildings built in the historical district since I've been here, and that's been seven and a half years. Bob Skanter, Park City Building Inspector I don't think it should be waived because it wouldn't encourage en-courage building in the historical district. I also think Park City is one of the smartest towns in the whole state when they put that impact fee into effect. With the impact fee they've got money behind them for services like water, sewer and upkeep. A lot of other towns are in trouble because be-cause they don't have that money. I J I' f 1 1 i I I If s I -J XA Si Dale Nelson, landlord In the historical district Yes, I definitely do. All of the newer sections of town ride on the coat tails of the historical, decaying, decay-ing, decadent, non"-growing portions por-tions of Park City. We need more than just the waiving of impact fees; we need help from every direction we can get it. Isa Wright, local resident I don't think the impact fee should be waived as long as it stays within reason. Waiving it wouldn't encourage new building in the historical district. Cindy Nelson, Park City Floral I can't imagine it being totally free to build in the historical district. To reduce the impact fee would be more reasonable. |