Show THE FOURTH DISTRICT ML COURT special civil trial calendar setting Sot ting DRAWING OF THE TERM hacklen defeated in their fight against the union depot company south ogden muddle continued 0 judge miner Aliner had a very busy day lay in ili the fourth district court yesterday and transacted a large amount of business the territorial supreme co court u rt having adjourned until march 13 th judo judge miner will hold told court regularly unil until that date yesterday lie issued an open venire for thirty jurors to try tle the following cases which were set down for trial on the dates named TUESDAY JAN JAV 2793 it if II 11 curtis vs Ys ogden oden hot rot springs railway health resort company 31 A breeden Brec den I 1 miller and maginnis Magin ms I 1 WEDNESDAY JAN JAX 18 IH will william iam bearce vs Ys anderaon anderson press aresa brick company evans acri rogers 11 harry ark T duke vs georae george G griffith kimball cimball ck allison smith 4 smith THURSDAY JAX sidney stevens TS FW lafrentz re receiver efter etc evans A ito ll ars kimball al allison lisull 7 farrand 0 organ n com company any vs it L fishburn P T J baly daly kirn kim balla ball allison FRIDAY JAN jax I 1 E 11 II parsons vs II 11 11 II slater kimball allison evans ll rogers I 1 zions board of trade vs william lindsay rich ri ch jennings JV 11 snelling JA M 11 II wheelwright TS vs henry reed ct et al I 1 A perrin painter murphy MONDAY JAV newton Farr etal vs C 1 holladay smith smith kimball A allison 1523 anderson press brick e company ompa vs E L deboise et al evans al rogers J IV judd J T trustee vs AB johnson painter Paint erck murpha 11 11 II enderson TUESDAY JAN willie willis II 11 booth vs union pacific itly co boreman boreman Bor ernan and J al coomb coombs P L williams A vs W V helfrich boreman boreman II 11 P and 11 11 II Hend oraon WEDNESDAY JAN jax the bennett peck Il heating eating and ventilating co vs J S knowles et al dey A street evna evans rog rogers e rs and 31 1 V gilbert abraham J kistler vs union n pacific aly co J E bagley P L williams THURSDAY JAN 26 bernard dunn dann vs newton farr evans tr rogers smith smith david kay vs archie 0 fisk 0 0 dev IV L maginnis innis roger rogers walling rill DAY JAN 2966 0 the american publishing Publia hing co vs the 0 OE E mayne co 0 IV W powers kimball allison 2975 the american publishing co vs E A reed et al 0 IV PoN convers vers 11 au P and 11 II II 11 if henderson MONDAY NONDAY JAN JAX oliver 0 IN feyers vs union pacific ry co evans L rogers P 1 L williams sidney stevens vs james montgomery d et al breeden gunnell W WL L Maginnis JA JAN A AV mcboy vs rio grande western railway co L R rhodes bennett marshal bradley 0 11 H smith ve vs NV S stone A G horn leonard mcmillan during the course of tile day the tile following grand and petit jurors were drawn to serve during the february te term rm GRAND GRAVE JURY J R elliott T W jones edward stratford sol myer samuel horsfield newton farr robert lancaster wm florence 0 P 31 mcdowell cDowell W F critchlow J 0 green thos stoker J henry taylor J 11 spargo A A IV wenger enger I 1 N ila hayden den 0 N strevell albert barner garner robert ross john green J J sullivan andrew P F burt james pitt F 11 hochstetler W S 8 morion J IV ramey rainey A IV warren if J morris 0 0 barnea barnes james mornine PETIT JURY job pingree thoa thos Li lishman sliman john smith sinith T 0 chamberlin J W dykins A al little W S holbrook mads ladan rich adam san Sand sandore breg bre W H turner thos 1 kirby john quale joseph smith thos wilson whet wilson david jackson alfred gunn thos irvine wm cowen aaron dewitt edward fletemier henry conant jaa mortimore sr J E coolidge luther reed john price jr chaa mcfarland tiar arland gideon alvoid samuel dyo perry patter thomaa duce robert crookston james john david littlefield kiel niel Y hanson S 8 IV gibba gibbs alfred goodsell frank ramsey G fred wright ht paul I 1 al paulson 0 O J Still weir J T T daly jolin john hammer david it R Il matthews atthews the hearing in the tile case of J 0 slade vs ogden union railway and depot coal company auy occupied the tile entire af afternoon hernoon and was decided against the plaintiff at ita its conclusion slade on behalf of biliti sell and others sued for a perpetual injunction res restraining the company from granting ng the exclusive privilege of standing ing hacks on tl alio 0 north side of the entrance ent ranco walk at the tile depot near the passenger platform I 1 to the gurney cab company bendin pending a final settlement ot of the tile case a re restraining order as prayed was granted and the bac backanen kinen bavo have taken advantage of the liberty thus accorded thorn them and stood their carriages wherever they pleased free of rent while tho the gurney people were paying 30 per month for the privilege under the rulea rules oi OL the company and by virtue vi etue of a lease tle tile gurney company baa has been still standing alding its cabs and wagons on the north sido side of the tile walk mid and therefore in tile best beat position to get patronage 0 as 90 per por cent ot of the pas 4 7 mengers lea leaich and 0 tile deat depot by the north entrance and exit the hallmen endeavored d deavo red to obtain the consent of su superintendent I 1 I 1 rin knapp to occupy the no north t I 1 side also but were ivere unsuccessful and the suit nag was the result after hearing both sides fully judge miner dasi decided led that the depot company was w aa g given iven the jull full right b by y tho the city cl ty ordinances to mato m I 1 any d desire e red rules for tho tile government of the depot building build inZ and grounds and that any backman who without first obtaining the consent of ot ahn company entered the grounds of the latter w as guilty of trespass there aro now pending in the police court against Sla two cases of trespass trespass which will be pushed T alie to sooth south ogden mercantile case sidney stevens et al ve vs solomon C stephens et al should have come up tip on oil an order to show cause why the restraining order should not bo be dissolved dis alved but owing to the trial of the tire depot case occupying so much time a continuance was taken without date in the other case in which the demurrer to the corni faint 1 was sustained last week ten days d a ys time were grant granted ed in in winch which to lile file an amended complaint in the case of 0 G snow vs L 11 II berg perg et aa a an order was entered allowing defendants to answer within ten days d S aan in tho tile case of the astoria national bank of oregon AS Ys W IV corey et al an orde order was entered clui changing nging the date for hearing on motion to dissolve tho the attachment from wednesday january to saturday 4 january tho the caso case pt of fl enninger er vs sophia ct al was referred to 11 II if 11 II enderson for tull full reference tho the case of birker barker v Ys s powell was referred to linsford Kins Itans ford smith as master in in chancery for full reference the accounts of 0 states commissioner of logan were approved I 1 in n the case of L G porter vs A S condon ct et al a motion tor for a decree waa was talen taken under advisement in the case of william bailey Balley vs sidney stevens an order wa was entered extending the time to prepare and serve trans transcript clip ton on a appeal p I 1 Inthe it tile ease cise 0 J 11 macmillan ani anti OR 0 R leonard vs utah university of the methodist Methe dist church the demurrer to the complaint was submitted without argument t and overruled five days were granted to answer in lit the tile case of of IV 11 II harvey vs A loroni skeen et al five days further time were given to answer the cross complaint in the matter of the estate of john in in the fourth district court for settlement having been sent up from the probate court a demurrer to the petition was submitted on briefs in the case of ambrose shiaw et alys al v lynne irrigation company com any a decree was w 1 granted on report orthe of the referee in favor of the plaintiff the action was to determine the rights of the inter ested parties in in irrigation canals over ogden river |