OCR Text |
Show Rock No. 2 mining claims In American Ameri-can Fork mining dlstrlsc, alleging that the survey of the claims in pues-tiotv pues-tiotv conflict with the plaintiffs claims Oood Hope Nos. 4. 5, i'., 7 and 8. After come of the evidence had been hear! a continuance was granted until June 2f; for the reason that plaintiff's maps wore found to bo defective. Patent Contest Case. TROVO, June 0. The case of the Mountain Lake Extension Mining Co. vs. Pittsburg Consolidated Mining and Milling company came up for a hearing hear-ing todav In the Fourth district court before Judge Booth. The plaintiff Is opposing the defendant's application, for patents for Pittsburg Nos. I. 2. ,7, 4, and 5, nnd Little Rock anil Little |