Show THE IDAHO LAND CONTEST ate ur HID fnipU Aclnt III Anirlrn fall unpny VakliIiiKton April 17Aasletant CnmmlMloner hint of the jenerul land olllco fate ii hearing tiMlaronn protvot of thin IeoplonCiinal company of Idaho nKiiliiit the application of that ttato for tho MKnunllon of uliout0701X1 ncrim ut hind In tho vlilnltyof lllackfoit under un-der the Carey act Ono tpiextlon 1111 Is auto U us to what lands can bo sulccUd by any utato under tho Carey act Tho Veoploa company alleifcd that they wero tho prior l applicant I l and that thoy hail eommcliceil it iiyiiteiii of Irrigation taking water trim the sumo wiurco on the American Kalla Canal company through which the Gate had planned its Irrigation They liuUtcd that the slates claim liould bo rejected as tho yotelll of tho People company would Irriifato tho entire covered cov-ered by the 10 BystemJ Tho utato denied this latter claim and contended that the protecting concession capacity capac-ity for reclamattaa U not ciceedlnf iUOOO acres |