Show T HORH AGAIN jhb case of thomas vs ar C W lurking that wag on trial in judicial court yes ft erday came to a sudden termination oti 0 attorney A 0 horn aho ed the defendant the tes of the plaintiff had been intro deuced and they rested case ahei attorney horn moved that the case b dismissed dismiss od on the grounds that gence on atie part yf uie had not been proven alff that tory negligence on th part of th plaintiff aps clearly chown in the tafe froony adduced by the plaintiffs cwi witnesses the court promptly erana ed alie motion and the case was out 0 court the plaintiff to pay the costs wag suing dr for damages in the sum of al lebed to be duo by virtue of personal injuries alleged to have accrued by reason of the defendants negligence in the protection of the plaintiff while the latter was building a business block tor the defendant on twenty third street in august this is the second suit of this sort that attorney horn has won during the last ten days |