Show vv I BOARD EXPLAINS VIADUCT REFUSAL No expenditure for the con con- construction con construction of th the Twenty Twenty fourth extension other those contained In tho th origInal contract will be sanctioned by the city commissioners unless the proposed additional wor 1 is abEo- abEo absolutely necessary and confirmed by bythe bythe the board it was reiterated this morning b by Mayor Georgo E Drowning and members ot the commIssion The Tir board this author author- authorIzed authorized a o communication to the Weber county commissioners in n which the refusal to pend an additional amount for the driving o ot under the abutments abutment of tho tho Wilson lano bridge was explained ned Engineers had told the tho city board that In- In Inthe In the event the he di diversion di- di diversion version dam below the tho bridge brides 1 Is removed the bridge bridee abutments might become unsafe Maor Drowning and the natly refused to upend spend any moro money than called for In the on con contract tract contending that the will be safe while the dam Is there and If any attempt be made to remove It in the future a restraining order will be se- se secured se secured cured n |