Show i WOMAN WO Ar lOSES I DAMAGE DAr AGE SUIT Nan Robinson Suited Non Non Non Suited In Action Against i Dentist ya lan on suing Angus W Petty for tor 10 general ce damages and special damages In the district court ourt was suit non cd ed day in a de- de decisIon decision cislon do down n b- b by Judge Ji m J Jimes s y N all Ju Kimball hl held 1 that there was wn no p ld that th t the d Wl was unskillful In inthe the tho operation op r that th was on the plaintiff The plaintiff alleged that hM the de- de fondant was negligent in her teeth teth so n that a 1 portion lodged In her throat Hid and that butt later laler she was w s tick uk with pneumonia duo due to 10 Ills his IlliS Judge Kimball in his decision said Id in part part- Th There re Is no evidence e here that I the dentist was as unskillful In the I operation that th t was performed at atall atall all There Is no evidence here I that tint he hid had a right rl ht to anticIpate t Ili t there thue was as v s anything extraordinary I ry going come lo to occur durin during the tho course of ot thAt operation that th ho 1 Idid did JId nil all that th t is ordinarily done dono by byI I dentists ts under all o of tho the testimony te I in n this ColS case In discharging dis hi his hia duty I toward tov ard the plaintiff Here Her Is Iq a man mm that holds him him- himself I self out to hn base h ie e the skill that tha a t ordinarily possesses and the proof i-i i lve here that he did what slut is ordinarily ril done for tor torI forthe the thc attraction o of teeth and that I I while the th accident did occur and andI has bl been en the means of or a 0 Teat great deal I or of suffering to the plaintiff at the omm same time I 1 am m unable to see sec where I the tho itself can be Imputed to any a or any nce neg- neg negligence I nce upon the part p rt o of too toe tuoI defendant de- de deI I in this action I therefore sustain the mot motion I and it is rs ordered by toe court that the motion for suit non-suit be b and ani the same is hereby reby sustained and n It ItI itIs I I is further ordered and adjudged that tho the action be missed dismissed with with- without I out prejudice to a new action I 00 00 |