Ogden Sun | 1905-10-17 | Page 7 | Eastman Vs. Rohrer

eastman VS ROHRER will case Is decided in favor of the defendant in the caso of amary E earlman vs celestia rohrer et al which has been on trial before judge howell and 0 jury in tho second district court r verdict was rendered this morning jn favor of the defendant the testimony was completed coco after court convened and judge hofei submitted to the jury interrogatories which were answered in the alve and iu favor of tho defendant the case was a suit to set aside a deed alleged to have been fraudulent ly and wrongfully obtained from wll rose deceased transferring certain property lo 10 celestia the defendant submitted by the court were first did the decedent william W rose at tho almo of the execution ol 01 the deed in controversy have sufficient mental capacity to execute said dee second ald the deed executed carn out the intention of abo deceased regarding the disposition ot bis property both of these questions acro an in the affirmative by all of the juryman jurymen and the verdict stated rn corded the plaintiff was bv at torness joseph chez and elijah the defendant being represented b valentine gideon r