Show SUPREME COURT CASE DECIDED first national bank wins an old case case of bunting co vs first national bank eccles romney win against john beck the supreme court in the case of C E taum receiver ot C bunting co bankers appellant vs james pingree the chase national bank of new york et al handed down an opinion yesterday at salt lake affirming the judgment 0 the trial court C bunting co bankers of on december 1 1896 borrowed from the chase national bank of new york on a promissory note and pledged as security for the same of bang ham county ida warrants and 48 warrants issued by fremont county ida bunting co tailed and this plaintiff C E thum was appointed receiver on february 15 1897 at the time 0 the failure bunting co was owing the first national bank of ogden which indebtedness was assigned to tho american ex change national bank ot new york on february 23 1897 the last named bank brought suit in the court ot nev york against C hunting co to recover the assigned to it and levied an attachment on the warrants in possession of the chase national bank and on judgment and execution the warrants were sold to the american exchange national bank 0 new york the latter bank paid the claim ot the chase bank and Toc elved the warrants and afterward assigned them to the first national bank ot ogden thum as receiver ot bunting then tendered the first national bank ot ogden in payment 0 the sum due it and demanded the warrants but the lender was refused and the receiver brought this action to recover them the record showed that a receiver was appointed tor bunting co in the state ot idaho but not in the city ot new york and that such appoint ment in utah was not madg until after the warrants had been attached in new york tha supreme court held that where a receiver has been appointed or property has been transferred by operation of law euch receiver has no extra territorial jurisdiction over the property except that which Is found within the territorial limits ot the state in which he was appointed and such transfers have no dorco property outside ot the state where they are made and it will be administered for the benefit of the creditors and others interested by courts ot the state where it is found in the suit upon which the warrants were attached and sold service ot summons was had by publication on bunting and the counties which issued the warrants and the appellant contended that without personal service the property was not liable to attachment in the courts of new york the supreme court upheld the trial court which decided that it was sufficient under the statutes ot new york that the warrants or debt represented by them was within the jurisdiction ot the courts of that state and that the creditors also there the service was held good and the attachment legal judgment for chri defendant was affirmed the opinion was written by justice miner and concurred in by chief justice bartch and justice basken BECK LOSES CASE AGAINST DAVID ECCLES AND GEO ROMNEY DECIDED the trial of the action in which john beck sued david eccles and george E romney doing business as the pa lumber company to recover shares of stock of the buckeye mining company shares of the bullion beck tunnel company other mining stocks and deeds to real estate pledged by beck to secure an indebtedness of and interest and tore closed upon was concluded yesterday afternoon before judge lilies and judgment was rendered in favor of the defendants fend ants the court holding that ahe proceedings by which the were disposed of in satisfaction of the debt were legal and regular |