Show ALL HOSPITALS ALS I MUST MOST JAY PAY TAXES Supreme Court Holds That Tha They Are Not Charitable Institutions S STATE ASSESSOR WILL ILL ACT S In II I ii I Ing hm I II hiatt Loner I 1 tr I Coin IIII I I. I I Opens Ull St for rut rutI Great I lt n raX Taxes faxes H will wi be levied howled on umi tho thin property S of every hospital In iii Salt Sal alac lle City by S A C. C M. M Drown Blown In County Assessor K eHo I 1 view of ot the lie tl opinion handed down S I by time the tH Supreme court COUlt In iii the case caso o oh of Frank tho LImo S against Holy Crass I In which It t Is ts found tH that t the Institution Is not miot a charitable association but an organization oi COlle foi foa le pecuniary profit and that It i Is liable for CUI iii the neglect of patients Frank Frammi V the appellant in the case was wn granted a new trial In the opinion he tho decision of the lie lower court Jut Judge e eM M M. M 1 L. L Ritchie being lC reversed and th the V defense that the Institution Is u a charitable nr organization on which the tIme lower court dismissed the tIme action acton was thrown outI out ut I For or years the hO hospitals In tho the state stale of f Utah have hav posed osell as at charitable In lit- In- In V Opinions from flom the LImo county count attorneys In iii Salt Sai Lake county and auth bel county have been Icen handed down that lint such Nuch Institutions wore were charitable S organizations and ald under the time common law aw were tint not tn taxable ahle It I was claimed that hat a fee feo was vas charged at the time hospitals hos hos- hosI I lill but Iut that it Ita was a el spent H nt for the time of uC tho ho hospital and amid not held hell is IK undivided profit The Time articles of or were vea-e wele Introduced b by the in iii tub onto CaC The Tho articles showed that limit tIme the organization was vas made madl under tIme the laws s In of oC Indiana The capital filock wax was placed at S 1 which was wn divided Into shares o of the value value- of ur 1 t each The rime shares were WI fully famIly ul subscribed and amid paid mIJ and antI were vere V Interest bearing S Tho defense c admitted that lint fees ore were verc accepted by thin tho 01 Institution n. but that the time mon y was spent ent In iii operating tIme the hospital for the tho benefit o of tho the patients liable dim Institution it IL ILaS was aS argued by hy the lie defense were not la liable le for fOI the neglect of oC patients patents and auth especially especial 1 county charges as was In iii Inthis Inthis this case The rime attorneys for fOI ui the plaintiff showed Hint flint had hen been sent to lo the lie hospital as aM a patient anti and ant had paid S 1 ll J-ll J I for vi Ul treatment at the lie tion tun The Time lower court Commit held that 11 the lie hospital was t I charitable institution and ind andus was us exempt front from liability The Tiit action acton was ns dl dismissed lis without going before ut n a Jur Jury All ii I Points Sustained I a The appeal was made ln the time grounds that the lit II institution was not noL a organization and amid that lie tho court timid erred ITI d In secluding lug certain and amid taking the time cuso caso out of time the hands of the lit tl jury y All Al three points raised alsed by ly the appellant were vere sustained by the he court The rhe opinion stated staled that lint In n several e places th tIme the e as to lo whal happened at ul the the ii e LI hospital the he given ul Sl by ly tho thid physician to lie n nurse Use and auth ant t the h c l t re- re wu vae In II conflict cOllel and that lint tIme the tw l j U ury un a aso Uio i ought to ha have havo hagon gon gout gone before the I The Time action was wm bi ought ht by loffon to Lo over let damages for COl the time lUSH loss of oC tIll tho sight I ht of one uno of Jf hi hits his eyes lUou though h neglect while a a l patient at the thc went to the time hospital hos hues pital on tom 01 Jul July J uly 18 IS 1 8 1 1903 Tho case cUe will go o Judge Morris Mor Moe- aI ris L. L for 01 where horo it I was dismissed before To ru A Af f I Ho Iho o Is I In 11 ii the tIme face fac of if t this his opinion As- As hC SOI said ald la lust last t II night ht that he lit send d deputies s pUll to t me various vamious hospitals hos hios- und anti le levy an aim a assessment s on the tho Iii properly The total valuation of uC the time four foul hospitals In fn Salt Fait Sal Lake City Is l placed at and ond the tho county count will wi realize considerable revenue rc from flum moan the lie taxation of oC this It I is probable that a test lest case will wi be he made however but Mr 11 Brown will wi go gu ahead and ll levy y time the assessment assessment Thc Tho opinion was wa written by ly Justice I D. D N. N and alt concurred In lii II by Ij Chief Justice V. W. M. M l. l McCarty limit Justice Joseph U. U Flick Filch Hn Suit Stilt O er The second opinion handed tided down Monday IJ by the time Supreme court was in inthe inthe the lie case cuso of ut Raphael eli Cotta Cutrel against Alexander Pickering to quiet title tte on oil tto boundary line hitie Inc between their places The opinion places ms the decision de do- of t the tho o lower court in fn which Ic Collel wU was awarded fuse possession lon of the piece picco of oC ground Involved ehl Cotti-ehl Cotrel sued tec Pickering for 01 or the possession of a apiece piece picco of or ground two Cc feet t wide vide I by ten I rods deep It I was wal asserted that hint Cott- Cott Cot Cot- toll foll 01 ha had nut not given Jhen permission lon to Pickering Pickering Pick Pick-I ering to tal take o othe the time land laud but Iut that he hc had imad Just fenced it Jt ore off as us his property In Iii tho defense made to the time suit It tJ several sew sev se eral el-al technicalities were cre raised which were Cl vei overruled I by tho the Supreme court The he opinion was waN written I by Justice Prick FrIck and anti concurred ed In by the Ito two other members of or tIme tho belch bench |