OCR Text |
Show 7 livestock; Domestic: 1 family. POU: SWI4SWI4 Sec . 14.T2S.R2W. SCRIBED IN THE COMPLAINT ADVERSE TO previous page PLAINTIFF'S OWNERSoutheast Corner of the SHIP OR CUHJDING HIS Northeast Quarter or the TITLETIIERETO DESIGNortheast Quarter, thence NATED AS JOHN DOES South 2078 feet; thence I THROUGH 10, Defendants. North 56 5' West 452 feet; THE STATE OF UTAH thence North bf'W West 256 feet; thence South TO: THE HEIRS OF 8SS00F West 420 feet; thence MAUD MATEER AND North 6930'West 201 feet; ALL OTHER PERSONS INTERthence North SSW West CI.AIMING ANY 145 feet; thence North EST IN. OR LIEN UPON, REAL PROPERTY 274S' West 489 feet; tliencc THE I IEREIN DESCRIBED, OR North 1600 West 85 feet; T thence North 2700 West ANY PAR THEREOF, GREETINGS: 200 feet; thence North You are hereby sum5 03 O' West along canal flic fence 1200 moned and required to in writing to ANSWER an feet; thence North 350 fed; or fed thence East 160 rods to the the COMPLAINT Plainti IT, with the McNccly, of point beginning. the ALSO, the Northeast Clerk of and to serve upon or Quarter of the Northeast Court, mail to Joel D. Bcrrctt, AtQuarter. EXCEl'TINCi Box THEREFROM: Beginning torney at Law, at P.O. Utah 84066 Roosevelt, 262, at a point on the East line of said Sedion 3, said point a copy of said answer, within twenty (20) days being South 00200" list Sum912.07 fed from the North- after service of this forth what east Comer of said Section mons and to set interest or lien, if any, you 3; thence South 002')0" real East 253.64 fed along said have in or to that certain East line; thence North property, or part thereof, 874444"West 124.61 fed situated in Duchesne Utah and more along an existing fence and County, beextension thereof to an Iron particularly described low. North thence l00'03 rod; If you fail so to do, judgWest 219.78 led along an ment by default wi be taken existing fence to an iron rod; relief thence North 77 5 28" against you for the COMin said demanded 1 East 3 .44 fed to the point PLAINT, which has been ofbeginning. flled with the Clerk of the on at a point Beginning Court. said the East line of Sedion 3, This action is brought to Township 4 South, Range 2 title in PlaintifTto the West, of the Uintah Special quid situated in real property said Base and Meridian, Duchrsne County, Utah and point being South 00200" East 912.07 feet from the more particularly described Northeast Comer of said as follows: TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, Sedion 3: 4 WEST, Thence South 00200" RANGE BASE SPECIAL UINTAH said East 253.64 fed along & MERIDIAN. SECTION East line; Thence North 8744'44" H: The Northwest Quarter West 124.61 fed along an of the Southwest Quarter. existing fence and extension DATED this 25 day of thereof to an iron rod; 2001. May, North Thence l0003" JOEL D. BERRETT West 219.78 feet along an Attorney for Plaintiff existing fence to an iron rod; ThcnceNorth 77I5'28" Address of Clerk: East 1 3 .44 fed to the point Clerk of the Court ofbeginning. Eighth Distrid Court WITH TOGETHER P.O. Box 1286 AND SUBJECT TO a 30 Roosevelt, Utah 84066 fed wide along Published in the Uintah the existing roadway to Basin Standard June 26, July County Road Number 43, 3 and 10, 2001. the centerline of said defurther being scribed as follows: Beginning at a point on the West lincofsaid County Road, said point being South 704629" East 2505.36 feet from the said Northeast Comer of said Section 3; The following described Thence South 900000" will be sold at property West 50.00 fed to the cenic auction to the h i ghost publ ter of a cattlcguard; bidder, payable in lawful st Thence North 892 money ofthe United States, 498. 4 fed; at the Court Entrance, ThcnceNorth 895837" Duchesne County Justice West 402.62 feet; Center, 21554 West 9000 Thence North 893950" South, Duchesne, Utah, on West416.l5 fed; 2001, at 12:00 p.m. July31, Thence North 870908" of said day, for the purpose West 256.76 fed; of foreclosing a trust deed ThcnceNorth 87I8,56" originally executed on OcWest 492.32 fed; tober II, 19 by I.ori L. Thence South 7327'47" as trustor, in favorof Rager, West 96.94 fed; Thence South 4446'44" Republic Mortgage Corp., the following real West 8 .09 feet to said East covering purported to be property Section line; located in Duchesne County Thence South 0"()2'00" at 2146 West Highway 40, East 299.63 feci. Roosevelt, UT 84066 (the TOGETHER WIT II 135 IrrUintah shares of Basin for any error in the adigation Company water dress), and more particustock. larly described as: Beginning at a point on Said sale will he made the North lincofSection 3 1 . without covenant or warTownship 2 South, Range I ranty regarding title, posWest of the Uintah Special session or encumbrances. Base and Meridian, said Bidders must be prepared point being South 90 deg. to tender $5,000 in certified OO'OO" West 701.76 feet funds, payable to the from the Northeast corner Trustee at the sale, and balof said section; thence South ance of the purchase price 0 deg. OOOO" West 85.09 folby 12:00 noon the day feet; thence South 34 deg. lowing the sale. Both pay06'52" East 84.30 feet to ments must be in the form of line the North a cashiers check. ofU.S. Highway 40; thence I I1 DATED this dav of North 55 deg. 53'08" Fast June. 2001. 276.17 feet along said North Michael E. Day line to said Successor Trustee North section line: thence & SHELL. DAY South 90 deg. OO'OO" West I.IUENQUIST 275.93 feet to the point of 45 East Vine Street Continued from 1 right-of-w- above-entitl- 1 1 1 right-of-w- right-of-w- ay NOTICE OF TRUSTEES SALE 1 1 '09-We- 1 demnation recorded July 8, 1980 in Book Page and described as 0 follows: 4, 567-57- right-of-w- beginning. Murrav. Utah 84107 (801)262-680- More correctly deseri bed 0 Published in the Uintah Basin Standard June 19. 26 and July J, 2001. SUMMONS (20 DAY) IN THE EIGHTH DICIAL JU- DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH COUNTY OF DUCHESNE, ROOSEVELT DEPARTMENT TED MCNEELY. Plaintiff, vs. THE HEIRS OF MAUD MATEER and OTHER PERSONS KNOWN ALL UN- CLAIMING ANY RIGHT, TITLE, ESTATE. OR INTEREST IN OR LIEN UPON THE REAL PROPERTY DF.- - as: Bcgir.ning at a point on ihc North lineofSection 3 . Township 2 South, Range West of the Uintah Special Base and Meridian, said point being South 90 deg. OO'OO" West 701.76 feet from the Northeast comer of said section; thence South 0 deg. OOOO" West 85.09 feet; thence South 34 deg. 06'52" East 84.30 feet to y the North line ofl'.S. Highway 40; thence North 55 deg. S3'08" East 276.17feetalongsaidNorth y line to said North section line: thence South 90 deg OO'OO" West 275.93 feet to the point of 1 right-of-wa- a point 1 1 right-of-wa- line y ofaHigh way known as US-4- thence S. 55 deg. 48 W. 29.0 ft. alongthesaid line; thence N. 46 deg. 12'W. 104.44 ft. to the said North line of Sedion 31; thence East 182.07 ft. along said Section Line to the point ofbeginning. Excepting therefrom all oil, gas, and mineral rights. Together with all the improvements now or hereafter eroded on the property, and all easements, appurtenances, and fixtures now or hereafter a part of the property. The current beneficiary of the trust deed is Utah Housing Finance Agency and the record ownersof the property as ofthe recording of the notice of default are Lori L Rager and Colin Harmston and Robin Harmston Skinner. Bidders must tender to the trustee a $5,000.00 deposit at the sale and the balanceofthc purchase price by 12:00 noon the day following the sale. Both the deposit and the balance must be in the form of a wire transfer, cashiers check or certified funds payable to Lundberg & Associates. Cash payments are not accepted. DATED, June 15,2001. Scott Lundberg, Trustee 1 right-of-w- cies. Robert L. Morgan, P.E. STATE ENGINEER Published in the Uintah Basin Standard June 26 and July 3. 2001. 1 ac-f- l., n 43-38- (A36605): NOTICE TO WATER USERS Moon Lake Water Users Association QUANTITY: 100.0 efit or 2500.0 t. SOURCE: Uinta River. The following applications requesting an EXTENSION OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO SUBMIT PROOF OF BENEFICIAL USE have been filed with the State Engineer. It is represented that additional time is needed to place the water to beneficial use in Duchesne County. STORAGE: Unnamed Reservoir, Capacity 2000.0 height of dam 85 ft., inundating 74.00 acs. in SW14NE14, SE14NW1 4, SE14 Sec30; N12NEI ac-f- POD:(l)N236F. 198 from SWCor, Scc4,TIN,RIW. ac-f- t., 4Sec31.TlS.RIW.USE: Irrigation: total acreage 3000.0000 acs. Applicant needs extension because PUBLIC NOTICE The Duchesne County School District Board of Education will be holding a special meeting on Monday, July 2, 2001 beginning at 3:30 P.M. at the School District Office, 90 East 00 South, Duchesne, Utah to conduct interviews for a Construction Manager on the Duchesne High reconstruction phase I, to consider financing proposals for the project, and any other pressing matters. By order ofthe Board of Education of Duchesne County School District. Dee E. Miles Business Administrator Published in the Uintah Basin Standard June 26, 2001. 1 Kennewick's native status key in court The decision on whether to turn skeleton known over a as Kennewick Man to Indian tribes for burial or to scientists for fiirther study hinged Tuesday on whether a Native American must be an American Indian under federal law. Anthropologists who want to keep studying the skeleton found along the Columbia River in 1996 argued that it does not qualify as a Native American under the law because it cannot be linked to a surviving Indian tribe. The federal government countered that the Native American Graves and Repatriation Act applies to ancient remains as well as those that are more recent, and that physical evidence showed he lived in the area for manyyears. UR. Magistrate John Jel- - derks said the definition of Native Ameri can will be a key issue in determining how he will rule. The issue is impor- tant, because studies done so far on the skeleton indicate that the skull resembles more closely people from Polynesia or southern Asian than modern Indians. A few months after the skeleton 9,300-year-o- ld NOTICE OF PRIVATE AUCTION Notice of Private Auction to be held June 20, 200 1 at 0:00 am. at G.T. Enterprises, 7485 South, Highway 87, Duchesne, UT 1 84021, Phone Property to be auctioned: 1991 Ford Explorer, Vin: 1FMCU22X9MUA 06901 Published in the Uintah Basin Standard June 26, 2001. NOTICE TO WATER USERS The State Engineer ceived re- the following Application(s) to Appropriate Water in Duchesne County (Locations in USBAM). Persons objecting to an application must file a CLEARLY READABLE protest stating FILING NUMBER. REASONS FOR OBJECTION, PROTESTANTS' NAME ADAND RETURN DRESS, and any request for a hearing. Protest must be filed with the State Engineer, Box 46300. Salt Lake City, UT841 on or before JULY 23. 2001. These are informal proceedings as per Rule R6S5-6-- 2 ofthe Division of Water Rights. (LEGEND: PoinUs) of Diversion POD; Place of Use POU; Nature of Use - USE) 43-- 1 1138 (A73399): Robert Ervin and Iva Lou James Trust QUANTITY: t. 1.73 SOURCE: Unnamed Spring (Lake Draw). POD: (I) N. 300 W. 500 from SE Cor, Sec 14, 6 in. well 100 ft. to 500 ft. deep (2) S 300 E 2300 from NW Cor, Sec 13, T5S. R7W., Source: Spring l.ake. ( 14 Mi. E. Spring Lake) USE: Stockwatering: 45 head of livestock; Domestic: 1 1 ac-f- 13.SE4SEI4Sccl4,T5S. R7W. 43-- 1 ac-f- 1 was found near Kennewick, Wash., the UR. Army Corps of Engineers announced it would turn ever the remains to a coalition of five Columthe Colville, bia Basin tribes Umatilla, Yakama, Nez Peice and for burial. Wanapum After the scientists sued, Secretary Bruce Babbitt reconsidered the issue and decided that Kennewick Man should "till be turned over to the tribes. Kennewick Man could support recent theories that the continents earliest arrivals came not by a land bridge between Russia and Alaska but by boat or a long-hel- d theory some other route. Reprinted with permission from the Salt Lake Tribune. then-interi- Sibling, rivalry HOW ,,, QO or i yOU 0631 Its a common occurrence in every family with more than one child kids compete and fight with one another. Yea, they may be brother and sisters, and certainly love one another, but nevertheless, they still disagree at times. The common term for the reason - behind many of the disagreements among the children in a family is sibling rivalry." Its roots are solidly grounded in that word rivalry. Whenever there is more than one child in a family, it is inevitable that the children will be rivals for their parents love and attention. While it changes in character as the children grow older, sibling rivalry is based on wanting to be fifst in Moms or Dads eye. For a very young child, sibling rivalry usually begins with the birth of a new brother or sister. Most children fool at least slightly threatened when a new child enters the family. In their young minds, love is a finite commodity and when a parent's love has to be mead to one more person there will be leas love left for him or her. At some level, its a very rational foar. Until that new addition, the older child was the center of attention. Now Mom and Dad are spending more time with the infont (out of necessity, of course) and the older child's needs take a bock seat (in his or her young ayes). Simply telling the older child he or she is still loved doesnt make the prob- i L&A Case No. 21581 Loan No. 627680 Team AD HA THIS COMMUNICATION IS AN ATTEMPT TO COLLECT A DEBT, AND ANY INFORMATION OBTAINED WILL BE ISSUED FOR THAT PURPOSE. Published in the Uintah Basin StandardJunc 26, July 3 and 10,2001. 1152 (A73489): Jefferv A Joan Crannev t. QUANTITY: 1.48 SOURCE: 6 in. well 50 ft. to 250 ft. deep. POD: (l)N' beginning. 600 E 850 from SWCor, Sec EXCEPTING THERE-FRO14,T2S.R2W.(6milesN'W that portion belongof Roosevelt) USE: Irrigaing to Utah Department of tion: from Apr 1 to Oct 31. Transportation set forth in that certain Order of Con- - total acreage 0.2500 acs; head of Stockwatering-1right-of-wa- CLEARLY READABLE (A73497): protest stating FILING Doyle G. A Diana L. NUMBER, REASONS OBJECTION. Rasmussen QUANTITY; FOR PROTESTANTS NAME: 3.73 ac-f-l. SOURCE: UnADRETURN named Spring. POD: ( 1 ) N AND l000E960fromWl4Cor, DRESS, and any request for Sec 30,T1N,RIW.(2 miles a hearing. Protest must be NW of Neola) STORAGE: filed with the State EngiUnnamed Pond, Capacity neer, Box 46300. Salt Lake 3.03 height of dam 10 City, UT 841 on or before ft., inundating I .00 acs. USE: Stockwatering: 25 head of JULY 23, 2001. These art-iforma! proceedings as per livestock; Fish Culture:. ofthe DiviRobert L Morgan, P.E. Rule R6S5-6-- 2 sion of Water Rights. STATE ENGINEER Published in the Uintah (LEGEND: Pointfs) of Basin Standard June 26 and Diversion POD; Place of Use -- POU; Nature of Use July 3. 2001. -- USE) construction has been delayed due to financial reasons. and investigations by CUWCD and federal agen- (801)263-340- 0 1 right-of-w- at Beginning 425.46 ft. West along the North line of said Sedion 3 from the NE comer of said NE 14NE 14, ofScdion 3 , Township2 South, Range I West, Uintah Special Base and Meridian said point also Persons objecting to an application must tile a FIRST PLACE-Roosev- elt Academy of Aks, congratulates, C loggers Express fora first place win at the Salta ire Dance Championships! Additionally, judges agreed that the team of six members be presented the grand champs-over-a- ll showmanship award! Pictured are: Amanda Austin, Cathy Rasmussen, Stephanie Taylor, Tressa Gilbert, Sherstin Hamblin, and Shaleena Hamblin. New USU position supports conservation community-base- d The Utah Division ofWildlife Resources and Utah State University have formed a unique partnership to create a Community based Conservation Extension Specialist to address declining sage grouse populations. Joel Flory will be responsible for developing; implementingand monitoring communityjbased conservation plans and agreements intended to benefit sage grouse, private landowners and local Utah communities. Before accepting this position, Flory was a USU research assistant working on the Parker Mountain Adaptive Resource Management Project. The project addresses sage grouse conservation issues in Wayne and Piute counties. In his new assignment, Flory will concentrate his initial efforts in Box Elder, Garfield, Iron, Rich, San Juan and Summit counties; the Blue and Diamond mountains in the Uintah Basin; and on efforts already underway on Parker Mountain and in San Juan County and the Strawberry Reservoir Valley. Additional partners supportingthis position include the S J. and Jessie E. Quinney Foundation and the Jack H. Berryman Institute in the College of Natural Resources at USU. Flory will be supervised by Terry A. Messmer, Quinney Professor for Wildlife Conflict Management with USUs Berryman Institute. According to Messmer, "the specialist will work fulltime on sage grouse conservationplanning issues. Based on experience with the San Juan County Gunnison Sage Grouse Working Group, to be effective, this specialist must represent all stakeholders in land use, wildlife and conservation issues. Central to this conservation planning effort is the involvement, cooperation and consensus of lnmi interests including, but not limited to, governments, landowners, citizens, community leaders and resource agencies. It works, Flory says. Efforts such as these have already brought local Parker Mountain stockmen, resource agencies and other constituencies together and created an atmosphere in which all participants have supported efforts aimed at sage grouse conservation, while maintain, ing some local control. Historically, sage grouse were found in 16 western states and three Canadian provinces, Messmer says, ltangewide, the distribution of GreaterSage Grouse has declined in a number ofareas and their range has shrunk to 10 states and two provinces. It's thought that at one time all of Utahs 29 counties provided sagebrush habitat suitable for sage grouse. Pioneer journals indicate that sage grouse were abundant throughout Utah in the early 1800s. Today in Utah, most sage grouse are found in the Colorado plateau and the Great Basin, from 4,000 to 9,000 feet, Messmer sqys. The largest populations are found in Rich County; the Park Valley area of Box Elder County; on Diamond and Blue mountains in Uintah County; and on the Parker Mountain in Wayne County. Other smaller populations are scattered in central and southern parts ofthe state. There are two recognized species of sage grouse in Utah, Messmer explains. All birds located northand west ofthe Colorado River are known as the Greater Sage Grouse. A newly described species, the Gunnison Sage Grouse, is found only in San Juan County in southeastern Utah. On Jan. 26, 2000, a petition was submitted to the UR. Fish and Wildlife Service to place the Gunnison Sage Grouse on the federal 'Endangered Species List The UR. Fish and Wildlife Service announced April 30, 2001 that a petition filed to list the Washington State population of Western Sage Grouse under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 was warranted. According to Dr. Robert L. Gilliland, recently retired vice presi- - Utah's income figures for 2000 just released Utahs Per Capita Income for the year 2000 is well below the national average.Sincel990,Utahspercapita income has grown at a slightly faster rate than nationally, accordingto Ken Jensen, Senior Economist with the Utah Department ofWorkforce Services. Utahs relatively low average wage (only 84 percentoftheUR. average); and 2) Utahs relatively large population compared to its total employment. A more favorable indicator is median household income: By this ranked measure, Utah, in 1997-9and was 14 percent eighth-highehigher than the U.S. average. 9, st State Summary One way to measure a state's ecog is the growth in nomic Total Personal Income (TPI), which is the sum of all the income received by residents ofthe state. Utahs TPI fur the year 2000 is $53.4 billion, up 7.7 percent from the 1999 total, which increased 5.9 percent from the 1998 level. Utahs 2000 TPI grew slightly foster than the United States TPI growth of 6.4 percent. This is primarily due to Utahs employment growth rate consistently outpacing the nation's in recent years. Another measure is Per Capita Personal Income (PCI ) This is an areas total personal income divided bvthe total population as of July lof that year. Utah's200GPCIis$23,907, which ranks 42nd among the states, a slight improvement over 1990s ranking of 46th. Utahs 2000 PCI is well-bein- 81 percentoftheUR-average- slightly 77 percent. Utahsdeceptively low Per Capita Personal Income is not the best way to ompare Utah's income to that of other states. This is because of; 1) better than 1690's , County Personal and Per Capita Income Five of Utahs 29 counties posted it 1999 to 2000 growth in total personal income, about the same as the 1998 and 1999 achievements. This rapid TPI county growth is generally tied to rapid increases in wages, which is the largest component of total personal income. On the other end ofthe scale, 12 counties managed TPI expansion of the state rate. of less than one-haThis typically occurs because of the slow growth of nonform jobs. Only four counties, Summit, Salt, Lake. Kane, and Davis, have 2000 PCI estimates higher than the state average. Summit Countys $43,200 is the highest in Utah, exceeding the state average by 81 percent and the U R. average by 46 percent. San Juan Countys $12,300 is Utahs lowest at only 51 percent ofthe Utah average. The 2000 per capita income of the United States, at $29,676, is higher than that of all of Utahs counties ?xcept Summit. double-dig- nona-gricultur- al lf lem go away. Yeung children dont have the ability to think abstractly. Understanding that parents can loVe all of their children equally, even when a new baby comes along, requires abstractthinking beyond the young childs ability. Instead, the older child will often revert to an earlier stage of development, trying to force Mom and Dad to pay more attention. Through such actions the child is saying, See, I need your attention just as much as I did before. The only cure is to dembtatriitt to sH your children your loVe for them. Tell them you love them while also spending some time alone with each. This helps each child see his or her special status in terms of your love. Finding sufficient time to give each child can be challenging, but it is essential in order to reassure the child and help him or bar outgrow this sense of fooling threatened. As children get older, what started out as jealousy over the amount of parental love available may turn into sibling rivalry where the competition ie for parents attention. Older children can act more independently and the rivalry may become mote open. Even though there may be a few years sepa rating them in age, siblings will work to stay firet in Moms and Dads eyes. Children may compete by trying for better grades in schooL displaying stronger athletic skills, developing musical or artistic abilities, or virtually any other action that will make Mom or Dad sit up and take notice. When controlled, such actions can be a positive thing, But w hensibling rivalry gets to the point where it ia threatening family peace and harmony, there is a need for action. Sibling rivalry is a natural occurrence unless it reaches a point where physical or emotional damage ia done to one or the other child. It hae gone too for if it significantly harms any one child's or if it disdevelopment of rupts the family functioning. If parents see that one child is winning all the time in this competition, they may want to tip the scales slightly, giving the other child more attention and time. But if the rivalry involves constant bickering or even physical abuse of one child to another, its time for professional help. School counselors are on excellent source for advice on excessive levels of sibling rivalry, or your Community Mental Health Center can recommend counseling professionals. Remember, all children have different levels of abilities and whila a bit of flriendly competition can be good motivation cooperation can also work. Haw ing an older or brighter child help the other improve his or her performance can end up rewarding both childran -one with better performance, the other for being of assistance. Encourage cooperation, while being fair with your love and attention, and you may find sibling rivalry is a thing of the past Utah cherry production down Utahs 2001 tart and sweet cherry 'luction is forecasted to be down the 2000 crop, according to the Utah Agricultural Statistics Service. Due to frost early in the growing season, Utah expects a tart cherry crop of 14.0 million pounds, 68 percent smaller than last season. Cold, rainy weather duringpollination ex- plains the 54 percent decline ofsweet cherries from the 2000 cropres ul ting in a production of 1,100 ton. Nationally, U. S. tart cherry production ia forecast at 357 million pounds, up 24 percent from 2000 and 39 percent above 1999. This level is the highest since 1995 when 396 million pounds were produced. UR. sweet cherry production is forecast at 235,950 tons, up9percentfrom 2000 and 2 percent above 1999. poor |