Show TROUBLE ofir A H 0 R 6 E last week vea justice christensen was called upon to decide a case that involved a driving horse and check for the case according to the justices docket was that of J C jensen vs S bloom and the action was wag brought to force defend defendent eat to play pay according to agreement as the jur ur chase price of said horse it appears that mr jensen represented the animal to be gentle sound and a first class driving horse the gentlemen went down to the pasture and looked it over mr bloom stated that if the animal was as represented he would pay for it that was a jun some weeks ago on saturday june 13 the deal was finally closed and when mr bloom took possession of the horse he noticed that it was lame tie ile was nas advised to get some shoes put on him aich which was done and the horse was put in the barn next borni morning n according to defendant the horse was so stiff lie he could hardly be led out of the stall so mr jenshus Jen seus sens attention was called to that fact that was sunday morning and mr air bloom decided lie he did not want the animal so told mr air jensen to take the horse and give him bim back his check which mr air jensen morning refused to do on monday morning mr bloom stopped payment on the check and the action was brought justice christensen admitted that he was no judge of horses v hen lie he looked the animal over so asked that a veterinary be called to examine it stating that it if the animal was not permanently injured he be would certainly rule in tavor favor of jensen but it if it could be shown that the horse was defective he would give judgment judgment in favor of bloom dr coburg examined tho the horse and advised the judge that the animal had bad every symptom of having rheumatism in the shoulders its feet er till the e I 1 t trouble rouble in ail the sh to the t e veterinary in ight be permanent permanent and it might not the justice took the matter under advisement over night went out for a ride with mr air bloom the next rooming morning and saw the animal in action then ruled in favor of the defendant and the matter was closed so far as the justices court is conaci ed d vr jensen has appealed the case to dist court |