Show THE CHURCH CASH CASE the government claims there is no appeal to the supreme court the application of the defendant corporation in the suit suil of the united states vs the church of jesus christ of latter day saints for fixing the supersedeas bond on appeal to the supreme court of the united states from the appointment of a receiver was heard by the territorial supreme court today the arguments on behalf of the chur church h were made by J L rawlins and L le e braad young and for the government ern ment bv district attorney peters claim was anat the appointment of a receiver was simply an interlocutory order of this court from which ther is no appeal rawlins ani and young maintained tai a ed the position in which they were well lor lorti tided fled breason byr bj cason eason and law that the refusal to allow an appeal would prevent a further c niest of the case on the part of the church to tay t i ay that the appointment of a receiver in the present case could not to be appealed from was virtually to take all of tho the churchs churche property entirely out 0 its control and beyond its reach fort yer ver it would finally settle the validity of the law dissolving the church corporation without giving an opportunity port unity to be heard beard before the united states supreme court if the couff sustained the position of mr peters it would give the receiver absolute power to take church property wherever it was ond leave the church absolutely without the right to contest that action in the courts court surely this court would not perpetrate such an act of manifest and grossi gross injustice the defendant corporation did not ask aik a ik wr for the property to be taken on out of the hands of the rece receiver iyer buz but it did ask the right of testing tei sting the law before the highest tribunal in the laud land a right which no reasonable and fair minded person could deny it was a matter master in which all of the people were interested and should be decided in ia the interests of justice the court took the matter under advisement vi |