Show CANALS AND REPAIRS the following comes from fayette utah under date of march 1 please answer these questions qu in your valuable paper first the companas com comp panya anys canal auns tuns along one side ot of the street before the citizens houses and lanes leading to corrals and stack yards the company has put in a bridge if the companas comp anys water impairs that thai bridge or it is impaired otherwise who shall repair it the company or the occupants of the premises it impairs second the company has purchased a right of way through the middle of a mans city lot or field has baa constructed constructed the canal and a flume no BO the occupant can run his city water across to the lower side of the canal and a bridge that thai the owner of the premises may cross crone if the companas comp anys impairs that flume or bridge or it is impaired otherwise who should repair it the company or the occupant of said promises premises third the company has purchased a right of way across the middle of a mans city lot and agrees to construct and maintain the canal and has put in the necessary flume to run the city water to the lower side and a bridge to the same if the companas comp anys water should impair that flume or bridge or er if it should be impaired otherwise who should repair it the company or the occupants of the premises AN OLD first if the canal comp company anys water impairs the bridge we the company must mu repair it and la is responsible for all damages caused ty by neglect in attend ing to the be work it if other parties injure the bridge by any unusual act then they are similarly responsible for its ita repair but tf if the bridge become dilapidated by ordinary wear the duty of putting and keeping it to la good order rests with the canal company which constructed the bridge and has bae to maintain it this latter proposition that the canal company is IB the later arrival on the ground aud d has baa to maintain maia tain a roadway that it interfered with it if new houses are put up requiring new bridges the canal company to is not under obligations obliga tlona to those whose whole right of way li in be condary to its ita own except as ae it its if own right second the which had bad to bull I 1 the flume aud and bridge must keep both in good repair from ordinary wear or from any special injury caused oy be cabai or its use nee the company pr an ejected its property properly into the right ot dt way of both foad and irrigation ditch and it must keep both in good son con on its ite property that IP if that which it was required by law jaw to con it must maintain in condition for use it if the he blumb or bridge be injured aured by the owner of the lot or by any one else by any unusual or lm lin proper act then the party causing the be injury must make it good or la Is liable for damages third the reply to the second question tOD covers this one A company which interferes with a public or private right of way either of road or irrigation ditch cannot escape the responsibility ot of compensating for the interference merely by temporary compliance with the legal ity the compliance must maat be permanent and re reasonable in putting ia a bridge or a fl alime ime over a right of way interfered with the bridge or flume flaw not only must be constructed in a reasonable sori able manner but must be maintained to in the some same ways way since at beet beak these are of a temporary character compared with that which w V interfered with and which interference la Is allowed by low law because of the necessity of public convenience and eThe presumption that the citak or roadway at that particular point might have needed repairs to la overcome by the fact that the canal company took the land there for its ita own use UM and other parties have no right to in further than to de demand that they are not compelled to sustain austain low |