| Show DOES NOT EFFECT CARRIERS an opinion was wab klen given to state fish alah and game warden sharp which holds bolde wat that the fifteen pound clause lu in ih he fish figh and game law does doea not apply to transportation companies the opinion in isaa as follows to t your request tobe to be ad liged upon certain points involving the construction of mhd dau and game law jaw pawed passed by the last legislature I 1 box bex fo to submit the ine following first will it is be ao an infringement of the utah game law for transportation companion compan iea to have in their possession more moire than fifteen pounds of any aliah riu the season when it is legal to them deetion 26 of the laws of 1896 round found oh ob page provides provider gai lt shall be unlawful for any person to take kl or have in 1118 ti pombea won lon in auy any one day more than fifteen pounds of trout I 1 am of the opinion wat that this section relates relate fl to persons persona who take or kill flab fish and hat ahat we the inhibition runs runa against them aljy and ad that the provisions provi aiona of 1 I the said ald section lection do donot not relate to transportation por tation companies companies the apparent object of the legislature yaa was to pro habig the she taking or killing ot of more than fifteen pounds by any one person in any one day to apply those provisions provi aiona to go OUM PaIlles would be practically to prohibit them from haud handling ling this claas of freight or ex prow p abond hlll the law prohibiting ibe catching of fish less leaa than inches long be enforced against a car rier or ab ippei forthe for the same flame reason as ae last above set forth foith I 1 am of opinion that the law IM ic question quee tion does doea not apply to or carriers oar riera chiru can a transportation company reship re ship from thin state stale fish and time game imported irom from another state late during any time of the year I 1 find no prohibition against it and am inere fore ot of opinion that bat such shipments may b be matie mane section 28 of the fish and game law provident pro videe videt it shall be unlawful for any person or persone perso oe at any time to ship or causero bee be shipped hipped carried or transported out of the any of the animal birds or fish or any part pare thereof mentioned in this act ex hepting carp suckers and mullets mullet 8 0 11 this Is ie the only provision that I 1 have been able to find prohibiting the transportation por tation out of the State but this refers to animals birds or fish which may be killed within this state whereas your question relates to fish and game imported from another state I 1 can see no reason why fish and game imported from another state may not be reship ped irom from this state at any time |
