| Show that injunction suit on nov a NEWS re presen a tive interviewed inter viewed attorneys attorney 8 stephens and schroeder with reference to the eleventh school district injunction uit suit the object being to restrain the collection of a portion of the special school tax levied in the eleventh district asked by the reporter when he thought the matter would bede be decided by the court MriS said he had been informed that morning by county attorney murphy that a continuance was desired until friday next to this mr stephens agreed inasmuch as the suit could not possibly be reached before that time the ferguson allen contest case being now before the court As regards the probable outcome continued attorney stephens it would not be proper for me to express any opinion further than to say that we think it a case wherein a court of equity could and should interfere to prevent an injustice this tax having been voted for the sole purpose of paying a balance of indebtedness on a new school building and by error more than necessary would be raised by the levy reporter what is your opinion mr stephens as to the position takeo by sutherland judd with regard to the injunction asked for by them attorney stephens I 1 do n not at thick it would be proper for us to give you any expression of our opinion for public ion with reference to our own suit sult you might say that county attorney murphy has agreed that no levy shall be made until the case has been heard by th the court some of your readers may be interested to know however that no costs will be made on these taxes the collection of which is sought to be enjoined until the matter has been I 1 f en determined by the court we should of course ask for a restrain in gorder if collector hardy believed it to be his djs duty to levy at once but it haj hai been agreed by all the parties interested and their a tor that no levy shall be made until the e cases ases are heard |
