Show IN COURT TODAY TO DAY I 1 DIA Dinwoodey woodey to receive sentence on ar tuesday the M bowell case continued was some delayon delay in court this mornes waiting for mr dinwoodey and counsel tile the jurors simmone summoned on special venire in the langton case were examined as to their statutory qualifications and the IdU following owing accepted I 1 t robert kobert beunie M X BL beaver W J Ij robert robert jones joseph jones robert robeo walters b ii conley jolin Way nian inan 0 D hendricksen jas aasc 0 drown brown stephen mckean geo aullen win irvine Rudolp budol an hAlff alff lewis J 0 shaw yeo geo G sardy gea A bergen A E X 4 lark abraham hanauer A ff aeve bettey ra beere 0 gunn bunn jas T racial 1 david keith H A prater E P clark ezra era thompson the knectle cie of the united states vs HENRY was up arthur brown the defendants fend ants ts coun counsel Teli raid eald mr din bam state ment I 1 have had bad nothing to do with it which he requests me to read to io the court this is the statement motjie to the lion eon judge of third district court mr mckay happened in my store doing business and I 1 asked him if he be could d do 0 anything towards putting ray nay case off 0 f r until next term he be said he would speak to mr dickson about it Dt dickson cison mckay anti and myself had a conversation ou the subject rand and I 1 have no doubt but what mr dickson had an idea that I 1 intended to obey the law but I 1 certainly have no knowledge of ever telling him that I 1 would and he may have said s something Q that I 1 misunderstood as my hearing is i s very defective but on the morning of the dinst before we entered the court room Y I 1 called mr blown biown and mr dickson into the hallway and told them distinctly that tat I 1 did not wish to make any promises in regard to 10 the future 1 I am sorry that when my case came u up in the courtroom court room buthe on the I 1 only ligard heard three or four words that mr dickson said but inasmuch as there seemed to be a misunderstanding der standing between mr dickson and I 1 told him evening of the ibe wednesday that I 1 was vas willing that the suspended j judgment she sh it id oe be set aside and that my case come up again and t take ike my sentence fren ken tence now that I 1 have entered en t eray a pleats plea of f guilty ditty I 1 do not care to it while lit e I 1 am guilty of an infract infraction lot of the edmunds law I 1 have not noi done so for a year and a half past and do not consider that I 1 have broken any law of god I 1 am wallins wllis to abide the judgment of the court H Dix dinwoodey wooDEY 11 mr brown I 1 suppose suppo ie under the thea plea of guilty he is entitled to two days an and I 1 ask that sentence be deferred for fir that time the interview between mr dinwoodey mr dickson and d mr mcka mckay y I 1 know hotl nothing ling about it certainly was my understanding bandin 0 that t lat do prow ise was made or implied the he fact that he was obeying the law I 1 supposed ased was sufficient to indicate indica that ke he would continue to obey it and mr dickson promised to me that he would omit the word intention mr dickson D 01 course the promises ot mr dinwoodey was not made on the morning when mr air brown was present but ten days or a fortnight bs ba lore I 1 have made my statement of this to the court and have nothing to add the time of passing passin sentence was fixed for tuesday fe feb |