| Show LIBERTY of atie THE PRESS tress the tho new york gli 0 tile jile following concerning that much abused term the liberty of the press there Is isome excitement in chicago about nan nau editor to t 0 jail for contempt of court the reamona meason reason for the thy action of af tha judge are not norf apparent and xintu unil lwe we hear heal thena theca we cannot express an i lon loh at AV thes ame time we wd cling to this wholesome rule that an j edi edl di tor who li libels belsa beisa a citizen should be punished that ahen he outrages outrage the e law he should be subject to 16 iti its its 8 penalties natt les and that there is no cant more blore pernicious and absurd rd than wh what htwe we constantly hear bear about the i liberty of the pres press 1 the press d does not want liberty bup 5 but out justice ardd arid editors who ask for any spec special mial dial log tOg privileges lezes leges or immunities are ate simply i toggers eggars eggans og gars gans who claim what they do not nat 0 t deserve an editor w a C citizen ithe n and resi resl dent dentis Is amer aMei amenable labie lable to toabe tho the jav jut jua as mu chany buchany much as any other othe citizen iam enand gnand enaud and aud resident ani ancl antl he the same common 1 privileges dollege reges lio llo and liberties bud bui but hd fid 0 a as s 1 0 m e t I 1 in 6 d conj 0 n g j fo jt liberties and presume themo into joail licence rf r he aes dees dor dol so ob lie bb should eti ell Q ble the janira ail arl a A there ly an y other citizen or resident ani bim fim ha ilo llo agi rg i ver ves tow tb wittingly 0 fibel libei h any n pe person rooi anu nii nil byh eh hwi hwd do does s 11 likou dikou fi wom wow lie ite lip ire lre be eid beld eld fy ta odo opo T I 1 14 v 1 tor for artto afie of lence e bt both legally 5 i i |