Show HAMLET NOT INSANE So 80 D by Debate of or the theat lh Classes at L D I S University A very ver Interesting debate was us held yesterday afternoon sj at l the Saint Saints university The fhe question ell lion tone He lIe solved That Thai Hamlet Will was not Insane WB tins considered by two sections of the tie second year classes tn lit I A tare large number of students attended the pro proceedings and ond the showed care careful rill fIll preparation on the part of If the speakers The debaters were II Iii It II It welling Norms Nom Noah and li rt Reeve for the and amid Hurton W V Musser Surah Taylor raylor And for or the he negative nall Etch Kich side lele made mode n it 1 clever cleYel presentation pre th the ar an arguments with quotations from tue tho play piny IlIA and ani with lIh the opinion of authorities on Insanity and anti on the lii text In brief Inlet the argument were ero ro a am fol follows 01 lows Al Ic That I hamlets Hamlet action were wore those Iho of or of an Rn i person but that this thin wan lila hit That feigning Insanity Initially Will was the only thing thin lint Hint could accomplish hIs hili pose Pe which h Will wat ta to avenge time death of hU his h father futher r Thud That he noted Insane only In tho the presence of tho those e lit hO wished to 0 deceive ml that bitt his hie conduct was ivas S otherwise e be before boo tore fore his hIli friends friend That Thai Shakespeare would not him have n R dramatic hero held tot for hi hIS hll actions That th theme ie are ere many degree de rei of ot In InI Insanity I sanity of which i peculIar bent of cit mind round one une That Hamlet had hud cause for Insanity In Iii his domestic That while lie he was vas nt ot timos perfectly rational still mill at lit other othor timed lima ho lie u unquestionably Irrational feigning madness was Will not the IheI liest het I way to 10 accomplish h his bile III purpose which In Is evident traIn from Its It II failure allure The Tho Judges jude Profs Prots Paul Patti r and alit HUner decided In favor of the time amra alive The Th haul of or Judging was ivan Sub Substance stance argument JO 60 per pem cent de tie delivery delIen livery lIen 35 05 p ur r cent and till composition 25 per pel cent i |