Deseret Evening News | 1905-04-28 | Page 3 | Ex-Pension Com'r Ware Answers Com'r Warner

WARE ANSWERS WARNER April States lel lol lol I K KWare J i I Iti Ware WIIO ti in mg to 10 I 1 charges dat igee mu ii tie by hy titus the V Wai 1 In nor e I of or violating order No is S making extra ot rut expense naldI ltd I 1 do 11 not know to 10 what mm hut particular at I the lie A A t iii d diem IUn might aught luave a 1 right to u n pension I and Ulc ii m ii K of ot a C them t had both hot Ii under u time tho old law 11 coil and under the this order 1 TS is known hi as IH is a th tho old ni ml uga ii go cutler ami 1111 tu tot It I t would make moo It no II mm ii Iffe under Which It till tt s HuId I It II Is I not Ilot a it I question of nf whether technically order older No is IH violated but whether sonic count 10 r r old ol got a ti I lon or 11 1 an 11 to which ho lie h wa lIli not hot entitled I 1 know nothing about what t the thA t lie I ss him hilI lit us round found but butIn butIn In Justice j mis t ice to the ho Ih i reputation tuition of oC the lie t lion hon List Jilt and amid culpable capable men who tulsa are bin bile nub ordinates Ie In time the th bureau he ime ought might before making m rum c the tim e rh 1 lo to examine e xii nit tumid and see ire ee any old udd 01 1 soldier huts him got gota a C 1 pension or Increase who was not lIot en rum entitled entitled titled to It ought to 10 publish time the names nil 08 of at such pensioners giving the hue III In Individual ul I names namON mis inca and mu I mu eta II I think t k klie he lie owell It tt now to the tho public to print time the minion and the lie company regiment lIt lItand and amid glo gIve facts autH not miot generali generalities ties tlell