Deseret Evening News | 1905-04-28 | Page 2 | Ex-Pensin Com'r Ware Answers Com'r Warner

WARE ANSWERS WARMER WARiER Kan I IM April Apri Slates R 1 replying to Ild by tho Iho V Warner In e I of oC violating order No o 78 making i oOOO extra eI ld I do not Know Imo to 10 what particular tho lefern rn A nol I 1111 might have si a right to 10 a It pension lel and 1111 of them had Ind both bath 11 old In and II ni under the tho order is known HH old age Ile and hlll It would make m lt difference under which It WI ni It I IH II not Ilot u II of ot whether technically order o Il el Xo No is S Wil violated but whether r sOle old 01 soldier ot n I 01 11 to lit ho was 11 not ot entitled 1 I know nothing about aholt what the I lonel hUH KI found Coune but butIn In Jn to tho Ih of ot the lion hOI CHt st und capable men mel who arc nl his nub ul In the Ih bureau he ought making the charge to 10 examine and nud ande ne e whether any In old ban hll not Hot u pension or who was not en CU entitled titled to tl It I Ind ought to publish the names mlles of at such pensioners giving the Ill In names and In I think he oen It now to tn tho public to print the and Ild the company regiment and ties Hilte and 1111 KNO facts not lot generali generalities