OCR Text |
Show - ''' , '. ' - ,.. . . r .. ,. . , . - . - th 1 , ' i 11 , - . ' t I - - ' " f - ' ' '' ::'DESERET '. EVENING 'NEWS SiTURDIY DECE3IBER , , i-- 22 1917 ' - , ' :!' r ' f, ,,, as, ompan ., --"' i i . 11111MOMMEIMIIMEINNIMEMPEMPENNIMMIEM110211001410010MIOMOMMINMEME, , i : 11 s' ' il - - .' e ater Supply -- -- . . , eanal. extends - . - .., , ea ., COUNTY "rill r - ,, E-,- t i, 0 t . , 4 !, ' - - , - s ,R i ., eet-on- . - votf .. . , , ; , i ':--- . .. -t e ' . ".--- . . . . - T. 4,f,,4t.' -- , - 1 Eni-:-.h- - -- ,: -- ' Zr 14441 It f - 4 ..I. ..' - .': . . . ' V - ,...' .:- lf one-ba- '.,... .. , ' a i ft t 1l. i 1 i '.'"1 i A .. , , , : '- 1, - 'e .: -- ,..... r - , I I I ,, , ,,,,: 1!, -- . ' , ti.. - wdjdcad ' . , 4 i. , . ' cv, ' k t ..I - - ' ; '' 11- I ,,,, N I.. I ." i St wa- - s $ I .;. north use of the Ontario Drain Tunnel the main ,... characterietic of irrigation dell tho protesta Alter these preliminar-- 1 volume of 13 second feet. a-- seeend4r7 canal goes ter to ttie 'valley n the eereeme et, I' the legal battle as to whether or velopment oe making a total of printery water right, -tot.' to Saratoga.,--tb- SUMMIT- almo.t -LAKE.-civueltruritbY rrovaglira rated vottime for voleme with the ' . friti.galttiltneftTitinatnht' , Ktah:that . at a relatively length oe the maitecanal froth Itu of 07 in Utah valley oldest Summit counties. should remain cu.- sa stage, when only a partial Rs present termination at Taylors- - second righte Ito feet. its storage water., recite . ' 411 tlottarY seaters of stream the began. is the all of mile, ebout to Water low I pa ., (when eupply through r 1 1 The d 1 To Fight Contention. feet the rteervoir systerris are .00mpleted in . , , capacity of 200 were being made, It was tlefinttely or laceidace with the water canal hav which the at were the top made the unite all 5 to the asserted opbr f.ffolorts ,r' 01 aggressively Provo Bench. Minima:thee to appruei- - j awarded in the judgment),a contin- , , . lit7ti hgtatth: coinnteterntlontlinef theitrrovkoe ttoo and 135- - second Sti second feet at the point of tacitly accepted by of flow frOill aces to lob tamely popriators 120 feetthis variance - make the the mountein. The difference-o- f being contingent costemplated deve1opment.1 te public. that the stream was cornsecond feet tieing toted to Irrigate arid oeon the tiviod of the low water courts-wor4d' en- -. ex- if the ' the waters favorable. I. ,letely appropriatedits .. in the ream of under land the the is 'lying rariable . contour which stage ,,,, ,,,, ,...,,,. A .,..., all. of torpriee good , --.' , . ' canal in mg course between these two The mean of there volitmes, 121 gee- 'orterrn s, '4 'PI, :deal of favorable attitude end' good ; ,,I..,. The the 'voltime, of l total added feet to' when room was farfor the'l ort ria capacity points. there were encountered tad that from the. IV' ' . . ,. I win, tro title corn- i worke winell (tarr y water to the weet of prire,ire ' oommere:al 'aiba and from th at source. bathos 1 t , expensian .iiit ho eeeolei , flow of ante water , the JOrdan low :t of ea:0 Ii,I it etotr,e, there wera brilliant and l' of 141, A merit An irer0,,' ile'lscher gives paee. feet.' The area of the err. tierieul- - I ,iti seeend feet A volume within 12 , d'.6) ve ;;;',fi ..; , , ' i ant, Tile and .., .... In Provo.s thisscciiiio coltitlitif14,1 Sii111 feet of the capacity of its , tura' land . esa...47714"4,dtates.a,...--0nral "'Ile' , entailflat . material 1"4"'- : ,iving exceptio ns to th .4 ''' '.1 l 1 .' by the earal end reached by no other diversion channel. TO supply.its high t4 when the peo- - i:rtsh coumv, howe,,,, was limited 7 :rine ,,f seitishrt : I.. , L.,,:,, water sewer id in excess of 15,060 triter- right, the company is awarded ; s.... ., of Jesao Knight. ' ct.,. k01 011 by the action of the to the acres.. ' I, of second feet front the natural .flose !kag ; t ! Looee E. , and James Ciove... , , , The flew of aater to the volume of :..41'''' the river by rirtne,of its appplitut- ..,..,.".f ,.......... wrime community. expanded the irri- t .,,, ....;... . The intere that Jesse I . a. -SO 0. a , e a 1'; bore,. , seconii feet. ; the limit of the cepa- WM' in th c.atate engineers office, No. il ...:. """;,'".1.,.,.!' l'ar oz,, ,-, I ? ,. of I'eteetneet creek in the beginning ,was a utoequently , ,16 , 2s rton re r Ie this ".',-'44;",...' ,L'),t4" This. voinme In ceinjunction 'rub' , city of the channel. will ndt irritintelle2it. ),:' , .. , ''' ; :',.;. ', -iI. 41 titbit of to 4; ,,-the ciig;:0 transferred the Provo itesersotr 11,..,,,tthis available .,;......., ,!, its Nue Cliff right of 60tiecon1 I' '''"2:....... from Cie agree, , .. ';.. i PlI6Vwhich from romPanY.. the its date of of in sale fins Its renal. the 920 acres. the fo,.. ast irrigated areai, to ., , Wr "4 ''. be- .; .: acarmrrryIta7n:ge ssvhnettehr"a '''''' . ..: '..... orgmization in Se pteber. ; ..,D ' ,,c1.4-'''t l ritY and tWh': eAla:l ljudAsgmaertnjuglitvent tibli; litthigae ticoonurtana A resolution i the community as dp came the principle and active egent eller. to the 4". erU r, .' of the Jordan valley is reached, there prove Reservoir companre water trip- ,,i-ti., I : to' VrOVitiP room for additional t extending the use of the Prove '... ''' I '..44 must more still remain - Lriverin,the irrigation of arid lands is than b.000 ply for all the land contemplated to be etandard pro, the of ralee ..4Ft i.."'n :ittlerit,to acres of Airy agricultural land lytne irrigated in its project, Is safely .er ri't th and Salt Lake counties ; ..,,..;:,.. '77.31 !ti471,;'',. , !action and.etonontize the ese,of the i !.:'t ,as.,i to not under the ditch. be vided for. The actual trial of the ease in.volv- practicable 2t tit' ..;. ri4 irrigated therefrom, eince there le Pr7,: ; ''' ' : et ,ster on the origirsil 640 acreshi, . iicc:-- applicakion N. set, was area- . connor neither: now Meatid ,,,,E)44,,r made, standard .of production, Mated with and fluallyeonmilidated t b' ..4 ehis iliiitif.S1 area. .ttlliAllii.' ".,....r:' 'run thr tPloTmrrrton or Gardeer end t Garden Oty's Banner Year , tetnpiated aid et enemy of use to extencl pro-.,..- lt Evans of Lehi for 40 second In the course or the development i ',!'', 0 of feet 1 V ,. more lend of the Provo the 0(.1,1 , reservoir 60 .44 to Per system. "' i..., lthal water 'from Ctah Jake for irrigation ,Irl'' (Continued from page thirtg) Salt Lake City anti litigation with . ' 1;111k, ,Islo by this means. thi) permanent !purposes, which had, Peen made ()et. 13 the Jordan River canal companies now .0 , t eaLrIcrrr,r,,t Lake 10, Salt 1905, more by oent protested City r-tr; appears as only the preliminary skir- - all". The Goddard Packtng company.1 ,I.tp,a ot.at least 60 per ..ef. 4fP 44 ''''1, ,,,ze coin,. ,'0,,,q,4,,, - and the. Jordan River t7anal mash. The main battle occurred with plant wUl provide additionel market,cov le at the town to build its instinanies. and anteenuentlY, approved by ilttl,'''i the prioaimants along the Provo for the ":44i?:'h.:4-:..t.'rch , r'i; fruit crop. and will Its life. ,: Ntitreestsrd-enrirl.rtls;,,,e.i. tile Piate engineer., - s lig roc , river itself. ' , a demand ,,,..., vegetables. eldob reale; .,...4..,,T'!:: if,"',41.it: '.:1,":':&'. 4 ' . After losing both caries.in the trial ir Baild Storage. Itesiervoina, to the farmer CT' :"- '1..4r? Given Printery Right& a 4. by agreement. only the Gardner ....be cak.gargresidenholecp i. )ii:, tfi 'A, ' Frifin the beginning elf cettlement 441.14., 7 .4,;,, ,...41::.4 . 4i.,,,:t 1.,, matter was crrried to the! as show trouble to a I'll Brooding began I of the :users .,',",' the until ".Orq.A.1.1.1k .1891. ,:1tet a litl ',. , court; the questions involved! 'lb Drill For OIL '''' i 110 project grew. Irritation et a , - .0.14; ,e,... aters of the ProVO river mere con- - , in both eases being indentloal. ..i eeellI growing new comer interference or ' The devetopment of on will be un- ii , prii ,,,,,,,,,,,Ltr. a ,gre...ez,, view In tact the ceLaa, of In that many , threatening the , interference with the ,iiied to its natural flow: ,. on a targe goals by georeral . new comers' rights asserted them-wiv- dertaken approriators having decrees for water committing. Vim bars acquired a;ter ear, the people of Provo valley in excise of their reaeonablemeeetel-- , more and more in the course strong and lenge hove holdings location ' : of- years, culminating in 1914 by an by ties. with economical use. reel AI. t the fine sterage reservoirs which which will -- Utah of land around- the Lake, for off action in the- d4riOt. court-et ere.., located neer the bead waters of !feeling of certain seettritY upon such t One of the twenty storage evertoire oir the Fero ytfeertott,trrigattoa by be thoroughly- prospected , in be .which 3,3011 acre feet, Provo. the voiume Reservoir 42 ' full dam acres. i of Ite. etperpetu sounty. feet, storage right height to, these and Oil Untertunately-21,,t stream. wells. gag have been aueh "rem I company was plaintiff. and - all the sinking nito and exist " hem for ftel. .;t coliEerVation were destroyed i hee known years other watel- users from the- etrearn, In view of the fact that some mu lti- a the Lpring of the fear following l, that tha ire keical forPork and Highler n peta claimfavorable defendant& The outcome of that not.ornitioni when defendants filed their applica-- , i being in excess of 4125.000.00. The the American to the existence heir bu,id;tig. no beneficial umeat all 1,51r1141es bowing. .greuent mation is diversion bY the for tion and when total it strewn Wag bends ePnroved to tried before Judge Morse, in which expenditure Dry olottoo creekthe to the "1"Y supplied edvanced them. In fact ; hold on ,e e; obtained Irv and of gag in payb3g quantities. state in the court's decision handed i up to the end of 1917, segre- uor..w.3 Mpine plaintifts, as siod' partly serves Lehi. at thcir destruction corn- - futurepresent surplus on the ground ofi ed by the engineer, Poe the first tested be he will -. The and tilts more than in dechief 1917. down In the $365000.00. of Justice that forego- gates creek in a wood cision theDecember. necessity; in other words. the Mg the! vete crossh ing Drye canal ,..4 at or near the natural peak of Provo Remervoir company Unto. opinion, were entitled to gravity ,expenditure on the storage system beto ha in addition thus to advances right ' water entitled heavy is held to be entitled to 60 second feet flow of bob cubic feet, and, when the ing more than 450,000.00. --high epriha, westward. commandingnearly all-a- t -, ., In the toes of- bridges. roaOs !quantity of preoent beneficial nto, a , of primary water as successor in in- a f 1 to 200 cubic' operation ol'ILD BOSE the arable of lands north Canal' Diversion bench Lehi; e,,,,,luino.40 4ajtetateiv, mum:growth feet per second. terest to the Bine Cliff Canal mane ind timber floes. In 1007. some,' is informing and instructive to read leaving these arable lands. it contin- eani; to 6.second feet of primary 11P1BY Bowan' B. Drtggs. In the years folliming this first', tw years after the initiation of de- - i After reaching the topof Provo bench the words ues around the foot bile and through btPr as suezessor In interest to the of tendan."' canProve of below mouth the Jut the dfift of eenserviitun, of the water, Utah on bothofof theseeupreme court Plaintiffs added ta?,; rights.' broken the northwestward. which country of Provo questions. the A book for all the Canal. Banta yon, the diversion canal stet the expansion of Irrigation by were Wright estate. It is adjudged to be more punips Ai their plant- contended Reservoir company runs for two or high above Lehi Junction to the point the owner of all Its storage water to and old Sr. held by this wholsongoe. senoir cunstruttion. the canal corn. I Lak.; iTt- -y Wit' latit";C aill. i It in suggested that at the timee de- - i three of the butte mountain crossing the the volume of 16,140 acre feet which, miles across the flat which is tale of the Rockies. Vidnitio i 0.alies of Heber City and fendants filed their application-witd to practkally at the summit of the at the completion of the reservoirs. gripping northeast portion of Provo bench. road Just the etory oC the Fireside reed. in conjun ctio n and boe' companies the state engineer ( October,- 1905'', the clanies thence the Mountain pass; l crossing it skirts would northwestward thence low me the water o Court provide during going iliae. Supre ling hour. Opinion. city, with some i appropriate and pump from the lake the foot hills and mountain bone Jordan river in a steel tube, it reaches period in July. August and Septen3- gLtil ?enigma Prim MSS- fi on,i sapport from the canal corn-- t $t 'Utah Supreme Coun,..tessorts. 40 cubic feet of water per 'second: along well above the adjacent arable the west nide of the Jordan river at ber a length of time ranging between 'tattles of Utah valleyJesse Knight i page 38. etc. NEWS BOCE erroax DESER and other .2ii0 feet so and 76 days. a continuous flow of more an plaintiff than of elevation prior appropriator; Fork American the lands, crossing i y hinaelf---thes-e aiaociations and in- I The question for determination not 'parties to this action, had acquir- - i of American above that stream. dividing Just as it from 108 to In sesiond feet The Loading Book Concern. g Main St. .aitlitals.- probably others. at divers however, is not how much water ap- - ed a vested eight as against defend- - i river near the mouth In addition, the sompany has the Salt Lake alLir Utah. Pork canyon, it proceeds then across reaches the west side of the Jordan :apc,,, mune approaches to the prob- - wahine' (Salt Lake City and Jordan ,ants and other subsequent appropria- - i a require tobuat tfocerst vtoertalteeiwe adandotutse irkuet bwauttre. IT""e ClivadmPalthetl Whenever' any one ap- - what amount interest applied resource with the ap- - useful and beneficial purpose for a proof offered at the trial ali I read the p r 0 at- h e t I this earence of intention, 'everyene else term of years prier 40 the time when record. not nil fails to support such etthe river looked on with jealous., respondents (Gardner and Evans and claim Or contention but, on the con-- ! 1 Reservoir Company) I Provo L. tibit anta made trary, the evidence without conflict goneme "' No i their appropriatiota Dhows as doobti conclusively that plaintiffs, In 1902 the canal companies of Salt' . .; appellants' could. by Ise have have not ac--i i . , ageing tlpi .defendants, tie valley diverting water from and 4.1114); gutted the right. le take from the lake! the ' acquired to pleated right till Jordan river, ,and Salt Lake City, , an amount or flow of water in excess a greater quantity of water than wag, Whited an fictive antagonist' and aii .4of said 505 cubic feet per second by decreed them by the court, namely a -ir: areatening attitude toward any ,:..,,, ,...'''" 'ace-r".'"re-, M rikWing.4140,41allie frowaba,,,laaa...by , -' means of their punips. owl flow of 615 cubic feet per sec.', V., -.'..,a .. " .''''a"t Iver in Semmit, Wasatch and Utah, ' .:, , .,. . "The evidence, as we7 have etas ond during the irrigation sessun. " easeasea, ,' '''a r,. ea!'' I.7; , ,.,7,4 ,..... . -. ; however. Is conclusive 1'1 r c.oThe bad that they ,:,,, tetia'ati-iJ. Decrees Issued. presence of this nettand rath- not done so at any time prior to the 4 con- , '; g alien interest.. ''1.4:',,.' ,..;,..;.,:.... fl time respondents made their applies. i.u.ay Salt 1,akeCity and the canal cont-- 1 ,: .. , ., 7...,,,-a !, II : , aeidated the interests on the river tion and . A t under facet the henee, , and waters from ;144i.,,,a ....'1 ; 41t. pantos the a ..,,..: .; diverting ...,74, , at Jeast, aa far as oral ex- - circumetances of this case, ;1,, i :' .: sat .,,4 ec.., appellants, t dan bad, in the years preceding the ttaeeli.,,,..;,,,., .1..0,0. j,,.... tireiaon was concerned. A gathertne should ,... v..t. 1 be ,: to limited I, be,,e....... the amount of ntigation under discussion. been ' ,..ati on the water ia sil the water interestu ...t ',, '14'','.....,;',.;',e,;-47,,,they applied to a beneficial use fore the courts in Salt lAke countY! . . stream from Provo to the head Of the and not to an amount they could at times, and in settlement of those ,;." e river was held In usher City in 1902 , , ....aat a" have or ,etatmod before the Salt. Lake' Our contentions ,,ee. ,--- ..... ' a required. zo of e"e'Ird "A7. a, , etatete.laPreases..lhe....law.....eptiathat , ,.- ..,, , ,a if. ,..,...i,:atee-- , a. S I. ituktact , decrees in fixed the of very follow..those the ' '.; tersely quantity ebicla all could unite to build some' : t ...t4; , ",;' water i hut hinging.: eleneeleica use phial be' ' appropriated from Utah Lake' ot.ntee reservoirs. I, 4 , 4 Ar,,,,a,1. Salt Lake eiti and the Jordan itiv! -.- P ,, ..;,, ,,.,- -, There was a great deal of discus'. the banis.the measure, and the limit iby 7 ie., ,.i.,'. er some of canals all to at .,. use t the of water In rights , e sion at Heber City, for a couple of t ,,,, N,, second feet. These parties attempted this state? . ,t:-, ' 1A days but Salt Lake '..,;'14".. 'The doctrine refleeted lithe fore- - to use this volume of SOO second feet 34,;;., ' clan alver canal lit ti ,,... '' , v11 3,) ga log statut e has so riloften beim de- - theretofore decreed to therm In the: cane forward. with -.. '4!aati .t (,.. N.,. with...Gardner and Evan; and' Saw dared to 7, aV respect to conflict lenge arainst , t. . 'a Provo ...e Reservoir anor company. Y; of water during thoithe ' 14''' ' opriatiens ,anaruction on the river, the will to last 25 ?I ' aervecc. . year; that ft- has b000tne alb- - r The Salt Lake decree, however, teal do anything vanished and the gather-t 4 4ata,t binding upon Gardner and, and ..Ls ,,, ..... ; a re ,.. a 7 . questioned' being From that time until mentage, l'a ing dispersed. a ",..-. Evans and the ia Provo cume Reservoir ,,,,t Under the facts '1 . i '7A.:tweet 1905, everything about reser- - YlalkY Y e' Ve ..e.e'taa "' ,. 4.Vi , 1..01 1 t'41 , ' ' 'al iota and the expansion of irrigation an' """' no l' ' ' of their appropriation so terra was quiet along the Prom Peat Lake question strives and no claim is made tune the In 4 Salt Lake trial. and .4 the', City . . t had raised the menace or its power that appellants did not have a reason- - Jordan River si . 4...t ' canals were put upon! a j. I a. I a; 11,.., !... ' ' and the subsidiary and tributary coml. able time In which to complete their their '.' ic.,:oliata el '''' proof of use of the water of; means threalgh Irttle'h : ties bowed in aequiescence. the water Utah lake. 4 a That showed proof coll.! 4.... aae.t4. no Aug. 22, 190i. the TimPastleos 'ought to be appropriated by them elusively theT had as a ra.litaank the' ,, '7,41(tailek.,' AA .,.4,,- , t c. , , .., ; - i Irrigation Company of Heber City, the reuld be end was OPPlied in a ben.' flow from the Jordan river at compro-- 1 ,..-0 e , ,. III ncilLl'uote. And , the 7 'goes concurring miss. or the use of five 'astappropriator in the Provo valley. 1 .;,..44 "...tea and bY1I .,i. , struck the first blow against the edict (Vint" of Junta! Sicestrer: 'When the the decree of the court, pumps, . ., , .,. they were lint,..2-et ea derendaaile sf no further development pronounced ..,..ato..:, ILO -' --'ilrelteeePartY.,..f...! '. -1 LY '"'"..,, company) made of use. 'Y''16S' giftatathirinitir her correlated in- - tnehr , , tmeets. making on that date, applies, application. and at the Hine it ' The canal companies as Ile"Itit. . ..,;.Ykeesetaik . . '' tion No. 442 in the state engineer's' wee approved he the elate engineer' remarks. could , ''.',4, ...Pear., ' -have Probable bene'''' e ., s office to 4".et a le 11,600 acre feet Plaintiffs Malt Lake City et el..),Jaad facially used more but they did not :1;;'' 0 ' appropriate ,, or trete,. to be stored in rmerware in five pampa Installed-f- our ,a, . a, of 4,..latioli appropriate It before the rights; of the 41, V. a-01- oa ..,.e Vof',"; e aletia..... aeit, se w,,,,,tch and gommit coenuee at the were installed in 1902. and the ether, defendants in Utah county had Inter-See- d e -- - irts bY tif 01,..1. , ..N2,the fifth pump, ln 1904. L waters of the Prove rtver. vened. Bait Lake City was a grow-Th- e f,:,A edtch '.i.t -. of of these ing municipality, aweTheaospacity The most Import-teste- d ,. application was pubRsht.d. pro.. 1 by the Pwit Lake interests, and Point was wi100 ou. ft. Of water Per ant 'city in the Intermountain region. LIZ--ts 't neroved 't..! Tel thug be observed that Its futureurrowth was certain. lee It by -the a. , I future necessities for edditional water --- was just as certain. voMit' ? court! ...--litik. tersely limithe city to 4 EMU- I . . , -appropriation proved to have been i e's!' ,avesisselnedi.1---t- '.41e IVI:sa-tlI- S made at the time the rights of the de--; i. erodes:as In Utah county intervened , 1 A S it and gave not a dropefor future needs. , ; , ' ,....... ' Began Development. ., , . .- The litigation above. referred to' ,-I . , . ,.. .. , --- Ihaving legally eetablished the pressa ence of unappropriated water in the ''''. - REASONABLE : RATES: . NO 'COMMISSION. - 'et I. beet as Provo river.' and the.legal right of ,... I ,a Provo Reeervoir company to divert 1 191 s the , ,, . ; . , . , , , and use the same, having been iriven 11 a 11. i .0ta the. judgment &bete, at least to so 1 '' e ,ar a -a,- .,. ,,.. al- ,... 11 as the balt Lake hiterests were 1i , , 1 e.,. ,... ,. , I ' ,4 concerned: the Provo Reservoir rem. ,1 ' 4- .t... ,,. '. t,- --4' the pony . i .1 thereupon. began ' develop1. 4,7, loss. to a client. 1 , ,Established ment of an irrigation syntem; having ,,,,.., ...e, ;;-,- -: ; 0 Fl 1 , ,'' ' r .,i'' el . ..'' --'ir ' ' in Its scheme the construction of a , ' --' 2.11 .. Peries of storage reservoirs on the , .'' eli . ,4 ' ; TR .......1 I Provo river and Its tributaries, and: 1. , ;. . . . I .,:44 't:r;(.:....::.,,'.---.-' .the construction of a diversion chan-, s . ..... e nelfrom I'rovo river heading abotiti , ,' 3- -.of.a. mile above the mouth . ., ' 4 of Provo canyon with a capacity in ex- elan - 4-1,, ..A.Irilm,""..1111.11-' 1 cam of 200 second feet. , ,1111 High water. , or flood was to be in water, the taken . 1.111111 , - litial early part of the season. ,and the , , . water stored in .the reservoirs was to 7 . - - ' - be In nee released for the later ' part! I of the season. The canal was located,' ' , at an elevation of atomething more ,. , .,, ; .. ,. 00 than feet the than higher highest : , , of the irrigation eanais theretofore .1t r , ' t ., .;' . ., AR, . , I 2 11.. teaeh I (A -- i .L- I .1 '' ,, .1, .:;:: , : 4- it, ,,, - ' . , .,...i ., ' ' Woi ..6 !,, i . te., I, iii l ' ' i '0 -- , .........,L, !:,,,. . ' - S. :.QT-.1 . , e- i i es . ' , ' I - SYttelthoera-water----aneheeL-zetser- i , ' ! ' t so-lio- con-tam- ed m , eitt-!k- -- f - I ?...un-- pumps-wet...i- - I ire- elon4---Prov- 7 . , a . 3 - 1 ? . .; , I t,j, - 1 , , i Q:g1 . -- ' i - ' ' . ...; - ,,,,,,,.i..4-41,1- , , , -i i vol. reservoir be nnger 4,. ervedir 1,..Pree,O-Ren- sve. .,,...,.., ' -- l ! .,,,ir,i,.. I' - . i ,,' j'a - i . .. . . ' t' .1... , I ...,...,.., . ,.... '''''',......... , ;..-.- -.- :-., 17q - ' , 0 '' 'a ' Eft '''Ill ' AOI t Ca.' A . Ikthi . ' itti ' - . ' ' , tl,s timzlitkvr. L . . - ...,,.-"1:1',',7A,' .. ' ' 14 , -. m.,.- , ' -- Cby 6 - ,,'.' ..,, ,. .' your . EINIGI , InSW est Second South. , Hauling:-- Wd , ,, -- - 15 . .. ., p:: Move, Store, Out Service the BEST!! ' , . ' Pack-and-Shi- -:- - - ..: - - . - . , , ; - -- I ' - -- ''', .' '" ' - , . - . '.. ' ' . - , - where you see a good illustration the chances are three to one we made it. ... i. ce, ., .., ' , , , ' '- '' ' . ' , - . ' : .. C::S) . - - ' -- . ' ,,,oto '- "2- . - - . ' ' . , , - , ., ! - io 1 ? i . , '. ' ' - ' , ". ' , , e , , i 4 0 e t tl ! ,. . I is ,. ,lk , 0. ... ,4, t?,,, -..,' 4 4 ' i - t1 1 , 2 t 1 I ''' 3 t I ; i ... ! , f 7 .. i 1- - t,2 4) '! .,,i ' , , 4 if' ., 0 f 1. ' ., - I e .' ' ,. . - i t , - ' -t , . ' - , 1 1 '' ' They may no' t cos t you so much and be more sure - of results. you will : .. : Q:;t -- "' '. . , ., . - 1 ' . . ,i , . : ', A ', , : ' ',.I o 5. , , ;- ' ' .. - , CITY---:-UTA- - - pooled Cans A Spedahys ' ' ' ' - , ,: -- , ,' ;! ' . - ' , . t' SALT-LAKE-begun on th. e Provo Reservoir project in the fell and win-- - . 0.0e ter being expended In the oonetruction of head works, ' t , , tunnele and flumes to carry the water from the point of diversion to the, t .. top of "Provo bench. The first water! '' '. ' ' '' was used In 1910 a relatively small area being irrigate& tinder 'the C311- tour of the canal on the northeastern ,.,,- , ,,, portion of Provo benchfrom 1910 ontil 1911. the conatruction has been dill. The minimum es- t gently prosecuted. ' ' penditnres in any one near 1913 being, ' ; .. in excess of 121.000.00a-th- e maximum i 1 ' texpendlTro in any one year in )914, flat:19-.24.00- YEARS IN. SALT LAKE,: Was. 3231. ,Was. 3559. cownstruorkaoda. .. 0 ,9 k RTAVAI NIGICPIINIIII ' - . , - Lei11,6 do a inEilig: 1- . ... .. tam . . , ', ' - . r. one-four- th , . ,, o. 1 7 ---- ,...............--....,...,...- . - . A ..4.,- - - .,. --- ------- TRANSFER CO., I 2- . , . . 1 4 --Ct o ia '!'t you are a buyer off printing or:. advertising see to it that you .get I ,..,, ,'. .- --- , t -,- If ''",-..---;.- ", , '' , i , , 1 , , . , - ,,,aine as in this issue . -- . . . , . -- RAVII1G ' ' a, 4 , -- ea, Ill' 0 ' Christmas Ne:ny. s t, S - ...,... ' ,, ii, .. , -' - , ' . :, ' i ' v Y - , - ', - f or z..' ' 1.- ,,i 7 M0 , - i , HalloranJudge Loan 8tTrust - ., , ,.....c. "4-44- ' - , ,1 -- ' -- MONEY TO LOAN .., 011 REAL ESTATE - ., ,af';.t ,,, ' , P , ,' ;,, . i , ' .'' -- . , i ..... year s we made of the eng.mvin gs F or -- t ' '4, ii , ' , ,e a ..-,- is, thio0i 4.. -- 11!.'4,4, , Jot-sett- ...w"k .. f.- . courtsidacreesa-werai-esued.---On.--of- '.fl r...,..., ',';'' . ,.. 1 .) - i.. , I I -- ,. . , i |