Show I I l 1 Mh LILLIAN 1111 NOI Strong Hints Hint That Now New York Business Man Will Wil be Drawn Into Inlo Her Divorce Hi Mine II II 1111 month ago II and hN beautiful OLO oll hUll a of ot nt lt tl Knit Hull I iku 11 II 1 did her h r Hung Int no that WiS a I ghost of Ir 12 loi ked up II In II closet of 01 her lift 1 cm the the ory reverse of this Idea prevailed Hut lut shortly short IWI and 11 nen cro hy the tl fc 1 11 t hi I I III Of 1111 tal il II 01 her hll fur onn of tho ol II the suicide by hor lu mil his Ils long of the I I I Baling up I of If the I hI by I the ruf creo 11 mil that Now Ni clung ng and fraud rUI 11 for tor I 1 ft niu whom Mine rl 1111 Nor XOI lien ru an 11 lutor of or divorce from Judge I IJ J on 01 Jan 2 lust II t an 11 11 atlon this Ihl week wk to 10 Davis Dif In II the tl court lOUr to 10 have havo tho drIO set sut aside It I Is ec tint thai lot I rr Donne UNI not 1101 notto to oppose O tho divorce action I I tl I FUM tho Iho Now New York Herald Another I Is that he hl KI lell papers that his hlA receive 1 for tN of or to In be he paid through the tho counsel for Mine for or appearing in behalf of oel Mr Ir denied that he Iw had hiI I i oel received any 11 money mono from Dormo orme except which had Insisted upon paling him for In hl his behalf ehll and all which stipulated to be h paid In 11 n II paper which Mr h Lauterbach mym Mj was to sign Sl The hl Interlocutory decree If I not op opposed 0 posed would have hl boon eoll made absolute I three months lifter lt 18 Issuance I or on 01 April M 9 The matter Apri now rOell up II before borore Judge McLean next n Mine llo was WU to 10 May Io T 1 Sn The suit aH tried William 1111 L Tut tier an iK and upon his hil the In 11 his motion yesterday Herr avers 1018 that thai Ills hi legal residence In I and been In III He le says hu hI III and I Mine lived as lS husband and wife up UI to the end of August 1903 when she fhe tn Munich M to como come hew here herewith with the tho that If It dm he nb oh a engagement lit Il WUI to 10 Join her hUI If I not nol she wits WI to 10 return und meet him hlll In PaiK After MIlr she hete hee she Rhe determined to 10 obtain n I He iI lill to this on the Ihl of or his religion and for other IC HI had JOwo un 01 de dc th II Now W bank here with the linn 11 of Strong Co 0 Alleging that sho ho had an al In 11 these moneys I om Mine ta u them thol with wih n a tu t and bo boKan h Kan three civil actions for tor the of o them making the Iho holders enjoining them from frol disposing of or those sums alleges that ho tho first won tin he hud hul about thO action was WIS the Ihl rei of or a n 1111 ibl gram from I ta Co telling him hm his lied up IU Ih cn a 1 cable 11 n Idl in hU hi wife hut but got WI no reply Hr I look I 11 fO Now XOI YoI ml when ho got ut off on the Ihl gung plank he hI n with JunK In three Hi 10 1 lit hl wife wi f but failed He I to II J 1 H I Holey of or y Platt for an In but was 18 refused UP 1 became despondent and mil III I to 10 toOr Or T nUll Hull I Fin illy Mt Sol y to t hh hi entreaties and arranged IIan 11 Donne should xoe Ile Mme Im at lt Mi I Soley He II foru fOte they Ihl could begin heir ho 1 When hel 11 te re nhe ha hal l left lef thu Iho mom rom and Ind ho hn un 11 returned to 0 thu tho sani aul sanitarium There In 11 a n fit ti of ot delirium he ways lalI he seized n a pair 1111 of scissors and III of ot iho Ih In 11 hi hil wrist When hel he 11 had har somewhat d from hil InI h S hu hl an nt had been to 10 have no In III the Ihl they 1 demanded e and andi i i that If Ir Mine 11 obtained her denee of Ir mid nd of the tb III would consent to 10 i dense tho jointly claimed Imel 11 1 he hl Indi Indicated 1111 that he II to In tight tin Ihl il hut but had no 11 money mont to tn pay Pl i lonn 1 feen Then It II wan Wil represented to 10 him he hl al il Hint I hn t he Il wax wn inn If I he hl OI to 10 the the Ihl pil would pay 18 Ills counsel 1 fro for rUI him out of r the Docine In the papers ho he holad heI lad I uc admitted h II and 1111 Mine IU a had a I legal i lI evidence hue 1111 wan II lint rue and hi denied ehll 11 Home of o the III charge I but he h did not nt wit he hi might hl obtained II o hil denials The 1111 ninny mOi of or Mme Me He and 1111 the 11 wn 11 to 10 sub lb thi Ih hut but Is be h flint Afier r hud 1111 bin hil part of o ll ful 1111 the Ih condition that hu ho an 11 that the settlement of or H had nothing to do with the dl 11 ro milt 1111 he 1 nays 1 he ho realized that ho 0 had committed a I wrongful art Then and other ill the Ihl nl alleging II I I II fraud er I wn pre and laid r Ih court roul together er r with a 0 from Or 11 Walker to 10 the Ih that 11 not In II a It condition In what ho he was Willi doing when he tinned the Ihl 1 Un niu IH III pee I r ond hu her Hint having hen been A n 1 wealthy n II h elan whom die married In He IH III to 10 have hll lost his hili life while attempting to cross the tho English Chan net 1111 In n II balloon The allegation that Mme s counsel brought four actions tying up 1111 all 1111 the defendants means that Ihal his hi counsel wn paid or nr wag wal to bo paid her hl lawyers that neither lart a le nl residence In the up tho ground for fm asking thit the decree be ivl Rd aside It Is III raid the Ihl will ho he made next Thursday when whon the case will bo heard In the supreme court The of or till the life or and DOIme and nil all that It led Up to will be Ie Tho Jho story Is l known In Its lis to 10 several person It Is IK said to je II em hie hlo In III Tonie w 1111 y the tho now famous case In which K 1 Dodge In Is to Met the tho of his hi obtained l him In III older to 10 separ separate 1 ate her from Charles W Morne a I bunker whom m r rIt N It I III alleged Dodges WitS m obtained by h collusion In Ih cuso It If I wild Huh ix 1 lell Is hi a II capital capitalist I Isi well known n in this city Ill who 1114 on nn tho other lher of North who ha been a rt friend of Mme Mine tn year H It Is III wild appeared In the Uw when hlll It w n nin in III Its II At I time It w hinted a 1 proposition Will wan by an nil attorney to 11 begin Kin the which lint hAil began now noll but hul the IhO pio nf rejected jerel by hy nn 1111 attorney ho was 1111 of or the of ot tl III K n yet pI unnamed man with Dm It II In 18 bv hy persons who havo with lIh the ca i P tint thu Iho soprano former by hy his hiM ni loll In III Inn n po H hell nhe will be hn fren to 0 lInk the whole truth public In III Mr MI own defense It also 1110 ll I It when known will be h even Nl In the Mm he would dhow up 1111 i Hoeme Atty AU IM I ll ward Lauterbach today an un In III Indignant denial of ot the nude him bv h the former husband hu of Mme mated In III his hll petition for an annulment nr of ot the deeren thit t Induced him to 10 settle 20 o otOO tOO upon DOl 11 I Keeping for thin he hl The are untrue Mid Mr II t My h reputation us III a t lawver 11 will hol I would be h of lit fo int When th li ease lip 1111 for or on April 1 l I h hol w that lion wan Willi |